Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 12:45:13 GMT
Look who one of the one-star ones is from? Nothing if not predictable... Although it is for the common sense view of "Nothing to see to review" however, back when Tennant was on....
Regards
mark687
No - common sense would be to not review it at all. Giving it 1/5, as he has, is as stupid as giving it 5/5.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 12:48:47 GMT
Look who one of the one-star ones is from. Nothing if not predictable... I think it's madness. 50% of reviews are one star... and nobody has seen an episode yet.
I did pre-order the blu ray while I was there though. (The steelbook is a good price for something that will be very collectable.)
The top review is full of "We're only getting this to please the SJWs" crap. I guess the trolls have a lot of time on their hands. That said there's a funny one about Broadchurch.
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Jun 21, 2018 12:52:24 GMT
Although it is for the common sense view of "Nothing to see to review" however, back when Tennant was on....
Regards
mark687
No - common sense would be to not review it at all. Giving it 1/5, as he has, is as stupid as giving it 5/5. Fair Enough
We don't want to be accused of baiting or notching up our post counts do we?
Regards
mark687
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 12:58:15 GMT
No - common sense would be to not review it at all. Giving it 1/5, as he has, is as stupid as giving it 5/5. Fair Enough
We don't want to be accused of baiting or notching up our post counts do we?
Regards
mark687
Discussing reviews publicly posted on a place as popular as Amazon is fair game. Not sure what post counts have to do with the price of fish, sorry. Though it was duplicate posts that were being discussed on that thread - not capping discussions.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jun 21, 2018 13:45:15 GMT
Although it is for the common sense view of "Nothing to see to review" however, back when Tennant was on....
Regards
mark687
No - common sense would be to not review it at all. Giving it 1/5, as he has, is as stupid as giving it 5/5. You do realise that it is a requirement to click on a star before a review is allowed? Ignorance must be bliss.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 13:52:35 GMT
No - common sense would be to not review it at all. Giving it 1/5, as he has, is as stupid as giving it 5/5. You do realise that it is a requirement to click on a star before a review is allowed? Ignorance must be bliss. You do realise you don't have to click the lowest possible rating? You do realise you don't have to review it at all before release? Stupidity must be even more blissful. But then why would you jump to defend a banned poster anyway? Hmmm.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jun 21, 2018 14:05:22 GMT
You do realise that it is a requirement to click on a star before a review is allowed? Ignorance must be bliss. You do realise you don't have to click the lowest possible rating? You do realise you don't have to review it at all before release? Stupidity must be even more blissful. But then why would you jump to defend a banned poster anyway? Hmmm. I can defend anyone I want. Why do you keep picking on him?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 14:13:57 GMT
You do realise you don't have to click the lowest possible rating? You do realise you don't have to review it at all before release? Stupidity must be even more blissful. But then why would you jump to defend a banned poster anyway? Hmmm. I can defend anyone I want. Why do you keep picking on him? Because he - not you, of course - has put his review out there publicly. If he didn't want it discussed...."he" shouldn't publish it on the site of one of the biggest retailers on Earth. Of course the same poster was trolling videos of a fan with downs syndrome meeting Jodie Whitaker so I don't really care what "he" thinks. You would have liked the guy, you seem to have *exactly* the same opinions. But you joined just as he was booted off. Shame.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jun 21, 2018 14:20:00 GMT
I can defend anyone I want. Why do you keep picking on him? Because he - not you, of course - has put his review out there publicly. If he didn't want it discussed...."he" shouldn't publish it on the site of one of the biggest retailers on Earth. Of course the same poster was trolling videos of a fan with downs syndrome meeting Jodie Whitaker so I don't really care what "he" thinks. You would have liked the guy, you seem to have *exactly* the same opinions. But you joined just as he was booted off. Shame. Why have you picked on that one "review"? it's the least harmful of them all, and There are 12 others. Many worse. You obsessed with him?
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jun 21, 2018 14:51:58 GMT
Moderation: Please stop this discussion of a person who is no longer present to defend himself. Please refrain from the use of inflammatory comments and putdowns to make your point.
If it continues, this thread will be locked.
Adding: I found the review that you are talking about. And to be honest, just because the name sounds like the name of someone who was banned from this forum, that doesn't mean it's him. It's a pretty common name.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 14:52:51 GMT
No - common sense would be to not review it at all. Giving it 1/5, as he has, is as stupid as giving it 5/5. You do realise that it is a requirement to click on a star before a review is allowed? Ignorance must be bliss. Personally, I think people should have seen the product before they give any review... no matter who they are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2018 14:54:01 GMT
Moderation:Please stop this discussion of a person who is no longer present to defend himself. I would challenge that comment... he's here!
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jun 21, 2018 14:57:30 GMT
Please stop now. You don't know that the reviewer referred to is the same one as the person who was banned. It's a pretty common name.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jun 21, 2018 15:13:18 GMT
Moderation:Please stop this discussion of a person who is no longer present to defend himself. Please refrain from the use of inflammatory comments and putdowns to make your point. If it continues, this thread will be locked. Adding: I found the review that you are talking about. And to be honest, just because the name sounds like the name of someone who was banned from this forum, that doesn't mean it's him. It's a pretty common name. And the review is very tame.
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jun 21, 2018 15:18:15 GMT
Moderation:Please stop this discussion of a person who is no longer present to defend himself. Please refrain from the use of inflammatory comments and putdowns to make your point. If it continues, this thread will be locked. Adding: I found the review that you are talking about. And to be honest, just because the name sounds like the name of someone who was banned from this forum, that doesn't mean it's him. It's a pretty common name. And the review is very tame. You have to admit, though, it's lame to give a one-star review on something that's not even out yet. Also, I'm honestly curious how you know which reviewer is being talked about, as the person in question was banned before you were a member here.
|
|
lidar2
Castellan
You know, now that you mention it, I actually do rather like Attack of the Cybermen ...
Likes: 5,789
Member is Online
|
Post by lidar2 on Jun 21, 2018 15:30:08 GMT
And the review is very tame. You have to admit, though, it's lame to give a one-star review on something that's not even out yet. Also, I'm honestly curious how you know which reviewer is being talked about, as the person in question was banned before you were a member here. Touché
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jun 21, 2018 15:37:56 GMT
And the review is very tame. You have to admit, though, it's lame to give a one-star review on something that's not even out yet. Also, I'm honestly curious how you know which reviewer is being talked about, as the person in question was banned before you were a member here. At the time there were only 5 reviews. It was quite obvious which one was being questioned.
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jun 21, 2018 15:44:13 GMT
You have to admit, though, it's lame to give a one-star review on something that's not even out yet. Also, I'm honestly curious how you know which reviewer is being talked about, as the person in question was banned before you were a member here. At the time there were only 5 reviews. It was quite obvious which one was being questioned. Actually, it wasn't. I scrolled through the five one star reviews in question and had to figure out, based on my knowledge of this forum as an inaugural member, which review was being referred to. Details of the review and the reviewer's name has not been mentioned in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jun 21, 2018 15:46:48 GMT
At the time there were only 5 reviews. It was quite obvious which one was being questioned. Actually, it wasn't. I scrolled through the five one star reviews in question and had to figure out, based on my knowledge of this forum as an inaugural member, which review was being referred to. Details of the review and the reviewer's name has not been mentioned in this thread. I saw 5 reviews several days ago.
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jun 21, 2018 18:18:06 GMT
Actually, it wasn't. I scrolled through the five one star reviews in question and had to figure out, based on my knowledge of this forum as an inaugural member, which review was being referred to. Details of the review and the reviewer's name has not been mentioned in this thread. I saw 5 reviews several days ago. Maybe so, but the original comment saying, "Look who reviewed" was only about 5 hours ago.
|
|