Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2018 17:46:57 GMT
An enjoyable interview and an honest one.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Aug 4, 2018 16:14:33 GMT
An enjoyable interview and an honest one. Christel Dee can't say anything bad about Nuwho. Shame, but she is employed by the BBC.
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 4, 2018 16:35:54 GMT
An enjoyable interview and an honest one. Christel Dee can't say anything bad about Nuwho. Shame, but she is employed by the BBC. The fact she's apparently the representative of the Fan in general bemuses sometimes.
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Aug 4, 2018 16:48:25 GMT
Christel Dee can't say anything bad about Nuwho. Shame, but she is employed by the BBC. The fact she's apparently the representative of the of the Fan in general bemuses sometimes.
Regards
mark687
Sometimes? She said she watched Classic Who at 1.5 x speed!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2018 16:53:37 GMT
The fact she's apparently the representative of the of the Fan in general bemuses sometimes.
Regards
mark687
Sometimes? She said she watched Classic Who at 1.5 x speed! I’m pretty sure that was meant as a joke 😂
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 4, 2018 16:55:55 GMT
Sometimes? She said she watched Classic Who at 1.5 x speed! I’m pretty sure that was meant as a joke 😂 It wasn't hence why Twitter blew up on that occasion.
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by Audio Watchdog on Aug 4, 2018 17:27:44 GMT
Well, it is possible to be a fan of the post-2005 Doctor Who and not be a fan of the "classic" run of the show. And there isn't anything wrong with that.
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Aug 4, 2018 17:41:31 GMT
An enjoyable interview and an honest one. Christel Dee can't say anything bad about Nuwho. Shame, but she is employed by the BBC. Except she's not the one being interviewed, so her views are not relevant.
Anyway, what business do you know of where employees are allowed to openly talk smack about their employers?
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Aug 4, 2018 17:52:50 GMT
Christel Dee can't say anything bad about Nuwho. Shame, but she is employed by the BBC. Except she's not the one being interviewed, so her views are not relevant.
Anyway, what business do you know of where employees are allowed to openly talk smack about their employers?
LOL! Of course, it's relevant. Why not asked about Moffat killing his companions and always bringing them back? Has she ever asked Moffat a difficult question? That is her job as an interviewer! As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2018 18:20:18 GMT
Except she's not the one being interviewed, so her views are not relevant.
Anyway, what business do you know of where employees are allowed to openly talk smack about their employers?
LOL! Of course, it's relevant. Why not asked about Moffat killing his companions and always bringing them back? Has she ever asked Moffat a difficult question? That is her job as an interviewer! As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise. Oh, good grief. It's an interview about Doctor Who, not Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2018 18:21:55 GMT
Except she's not the one being interviewed, so her views are not relevant.
Anyway, what business do you know of where employees are allowed to openly talk smack about their employers?
LOL! Of course, it's relevant. Why not asked about Moffat killing his companions and always bringing them back? Has she ever asked Moffat a difficult question? That is her job as an interviewer! As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise. Tbf i think, considering this has been put out by the beeb id say its quite a warts and all interview. For example; Moffat slateing the new dalek design, him being questioned over his timey wimey plots, “clara who” is mentioned in part three by the interviewer. Sure shes not being antagonistic but then shes interviewing the showrunber of a family show thats meant to celebrate his time as a showrunner. He’s not a politician and wanting a more in depth interview analysing every choice he made as a showrunner would be unplsent for both steven and the interviwer. And lastly, is it so hard to imagine somebody, and a young person we are talking about too, being enphsiastic and love their favorite show? Why cant they love stevens time and not want to overly critiise him for every little thing they disagree with. Some people actually like doctor who edit: and regardless, the chance she came up with the questions and wanst given a list to read from is quite low, it wouldnt suprise me if the questions where prepared by someone higher than her to keep the interview profesional. But thats conjecture
|
|
|
Post by Audio Watchdog on Aug 4, 2018 18:38:34 GMT
LOL! Of course, it's relevant. Why not asked about Moffat killing his companions and always bringing them back? Has she ever asked Moffat a difficult question? That is her job as an interviewer! As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise. Oh, good grief. It's an interview about Doctor Who, not Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight. Oh look. Someone has derailed another thread with their agenda.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2018 19:37:38 GMT
Oh, good grief. It's an interview about Doctor Who, not Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight. Oh look. Someone has derailed another thread with their agenda. Not exactly - he managed draw out a robust defence of the plus points of the Interview from other posters, through his criticism. Paxman would be proud "Oh come on, man!" as he may have said. I for one like to hear criticism of elements as it gives a balanced debate and encourages me to defend things I like, or see them in a different light.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Aug 4, 2018 20:02:05 GMT
Oh, good grief. It's an interview about Doctor Who, not Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight. Oh look. Someone has derailed another thread with their agenda. How is it derailed? Aren't we all allowed to criticise the quality of the interview?
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Aug 4, 2018 20:09:33 GMT
Oh look. Someone has derailed another thread with their agenda. How is it derailed? Aren't we all allowed to criticise the quality of the interview? Except that's not what you're saying. And what did you expect anyway? Frost/Nixon? It's a BBC-handled interview on a BBC franchise.
In fact, you answered your own question with ''As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise.'', rendering this debate pointless since you already have your answer.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Aug 4, 2018 20:16:41 GMT
How is it derailed? Aren't we all allowed to criticise the quality of the interview? Except that's not what you're saying. And what did you expect anyway? Frost/Nixon? It's a BBC-handled interview on a BBC franchise.
In fact, you answered your own question with ''As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise.'', rendering this debate pointless since you already have your answer.
Begs the question, Why bother making it, if the interviewer can't criticise decisions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2018 20:19:10 GMT
Except that's not what you're saying. And what did you expect anyway? Frost/Nixon? It's a BBC-handled interview on a BBC franchise.
In fact, you answered your own question with ''As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise.'', rendering this debate pointless since you already have your answer.
Begs the question, Why bother making it, if the interviewer can't criticise decisions. Because as you can see from every contribution to this thread except yours, a lot of people enjoyed the interview. Enjoyment: that's why they bother making it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2018 20:25:48 GMT
Except that's not what you're saying. And what did you expect anyway? Frost/Nixon? It's a BBC-handled interview on a BBC franchise.
In fact, you answered your own question with ''As, she is a BBC employee, she's not allowed to criticise.'', rendering this debate pointless since you already have your answer.
Begs the question, Why bother making it, if the interviewer can't criticise decisions. In fairness though, it wasn't that kind of interview - it was the showrunner bowing out with a retrospective look at his tenure. Any critical reflection was in his court depending on how candid he chose to be. For all the faults of his era, it has still been largely successful. He proved that there was life after RTD and Tennant in the series. He is after all on record as avoiding online forums as he found it hurtful to read the comments quite early on. What of the things you enjoyed since 2010 - surely the positives outweigh the faults which are over and done with?
|
|
|
Post by Audio Watchdog on Aug 4, 2018 20:27:12 GMT
Begs the question, Why bother making it, if the interviewer can't criticise decisions. Because as you can see from every contribution to this thread except yours, a lot of people enjoyed the interview. Enjoyment: that's why they bother making it. Oh come on paz. You know that someone's enjoyment of any aspect of NuWho, no matter how large or small, has got to be challenged and/or criticized. Over and over again.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Aug 4, 2018 20:43:22 GMT
Begs the question, Why bother making it, if the interviewer can't criticise decisions. In fairness though, it wasn't that kind of interview - it was the showrunner bowing out with a retrospective look at his tenure. Any critical reflection was in his court depending on how candid he chose to be. For all the faults of his era, it has still been largely successful. He proved that there was life after RTD and Tennant in the series. He is after all on record as avoiding online forums as he found it hurtful to read the comments quite early on. What of the things you enjoyed since 2010 - surely the positives outweigh the faults which are over and done with? This was part two. Capaldi onward. Many bad decisions were made, and he wasn't pulled up on any.
|
|