Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2016 23:27:16 GMT
Hey everyone,
Awhile back on the podcast, a listener wrote in to talk about the cynicism in some quarters of fandom over River's involvement in Doom Coalition, describing it that some regarded as a pure marketing move. I don't get why people aren't excited over River's involvement - it's River meeting Eight, the man she loves before the damage that brought them together. Isn't that an intriguing prospect? Doesn't that make you excited?
Not to begrudge anyone's opinions, but I fail to see how anyone couldn't be excited over the prospect.
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Nov 8, 2016 23:33:29 GMT
River's timeline doesn't as far as I can see have any room for her to meet other Doctor's, things she's said and done and indeed The Doctors on words and actions just mean she doesn't know the other Doctors, the prospect of stories with her and other Doctors leave me feeling that the stories she's already been in are being robbed of any significance they had, and me feeling that I bought into something that will become a mess.
I got no problem with hearing more stores with River, but I really would prefer she stuck to her established TV timeline.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 3:37:36 GMT
Disclaimer: I have not heard DC3. I plan to do so when DC4 comes out.
The problem is that Matt Smith is River's Doctor. Her only Doctor. We know that River does not meet The Doctor between when she finds out about incarnations after Matt Smith (in Husbands) and her death in The Library. We also know that she has never met David Tennant (or earlier incarnations) before The Library (unless she met him in-between the Series 4 Specials), as she tells him and Donna so.
She could be lying or she could [have?] been resurrected into a physical body after her death in The Library and appearance in Name of The Doctor. However, as jasonward said, that would rob her TV stories of any significance. There would be a lot of backlash. I would also like to point out that Moffatt's intention when creating River was that she would know The Doctor but he would not know her.
The second problem I have is that she knows there are some incarnations of The Doctor she can't meet because he hasn't met her yet. She makes a big deal out of this in the final episode of DC2. But we haven't been given a reasonable explanation of how she knows.
The TV show is silent on this matter. Therefore the explanation must be introduced retroactively (the only way Big Finish can introduce things). Therefore the explanation (when/if it comes) can be considered cheating.
Without an explanation, the knowledge itself can also be considered cheating. To me it felt like River's knowledge was suddenly added to in order to match the audience's knowledge, without explanation. Also, for no other reason than to keep the audience's knowledge valid and to create drama around that fact.
A third problem is that I am struggling to imagine a reasonable explanation of how she acquired the knowledge. Who revealed it to her, where, when and why? I can't imagine The Doctor doing so because he does not talk about himself. But this also means that I can't imagine where else the information came from (unless a paradox of information is involved: her future self reveals it to her past self).
Even if he did tell her, how closely would she follow his instructions? After all, he could be lying. And would she treat them more as "guidelines" than actual rules? (To the last point: clearly she takes the limitation very seriously, but considering we have no idea where the information comes from we can't know if her attitude wouldn't be very different if the information came from a different source.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 3:58:36 GMT
Mmm, I think that more or less covers it. River's early appearance in this run of stories feels very revisionist and unfortunately just doesn't scan within the context of what we know. It feels very much like arm-twisting and falls under the recent Gallifrey retcon where the planet wasn't destroyed and Nine and Ten's struggles were subsequently rendered meaningless (another instance of trivialising PTSD, I noticed). It's a nice idea, but it just doesn't work. This is a proper non-existent gap.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 12:20:40 GMT
Hey everyone,
Awhile back on the podcast, a listener wrote in to talk about the cynicism in some quarters of fandom over River's involvement in Doom Coalition, describing it that some regarded as a pure marketing move. I don't get why people aren't excited over River's involvement. [...] Not to begrudge anyone's opinions, but I fail to see how anyone couldn't be excited over the prospect. Because River doesn't really 'fit' with the Eighth Doctor based on what we've seen on the TV. I don't know if it was just a marketing move by BF or if they really felt 8th Doctor/River stories were important to tell. But for me the Eighth Doctor and River together is not something that works for me. If others enjoy them though, fine.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 19:47:54 GMT
Hey everyone,
Awhile back on the podcast, a listener wrote in to talk about the cynicism in some quarters of fandom over River's involvement in Doom Coalition, describing it that some regarded as a pure marketing move. I don't get why people aren't excited over River's involvement - it's River meeting Eight, the man she loves before the damage that brought them together. Isn't that an intriguing prospect? Doesn't that make you excited?
Not to begrudge anyone's opinions, but I fail to see how anyone couldn't be excited over the prospect. I also loved River Song and the 8th's team-up, especially when it entered full force in Doom Coalition 3. McGann and Kingston have great chemistry and it's just plain exciting to hear River interacting with a classic series Doctor. I also liked that the method by which River keeps her identity secret is simple and unobtrusive - I was initially afraid of more amnesia for poor old Eight!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 20:20:04 GMT
I think the question as posted in the first post disregards the obvious - that it can be a good story worth telling AND a marketing gimmick to stimulate sales at the same time. Big Finish are a business and Big Finish are storytellers. The two don't need to be treated as polar opposites. I'd never want them to just make pandering releases that are pure fan-service (though there's a small place for those) but I also wouldn't grudge Nick or David saying "We're on the 6th Mcgann boxset, maybe we should find a way to shake it up". We've seen that with the Benny boxsets, each having a "gimmick" or novelty aspect to capture the attention. Doesn't mean some of them aren't also fantastic releases.
Adding River once was fine. Not terribly sure she needed to be in the very next boxset, honestly. Might be gilding the lilly a tad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 3:20:25 GMT
I think the question as posted in the first post disregards the obvious - that it can be a good story worth telling AND a marketing gimmick to stimulate sales at the same time. Big Finish are a business and Big Finish are storytellers. The two don't need to be treated as polar opposites. I'd never want them to just make pandering releases that are pure fan-service (though there's a small place for those) but I also wouldn't grudge Nick or David saying "We're on the 6th Mcgann boxset, maybe we should find a way to shake it up". We've seen that with the Benny boxsets, each having a "gimmick" or novelty aspect to capture the attention. Doesn't mean some of them aren't also fantastic releases.
I was parphasing the original letter. Believe me, I share your sentiments. It's Big Finish - the company famously known for bending over backwards for trying to appeal to all sorts of fans. The cyncisim to my mind, is incredibly unearnt (and with that refresher, surely a mindwipe didn't cross the minds of fans). There is a wonderful sincerity to Big Finish, they really are fans who know they have the best job in the world and want to tell the best stories they can. Oddly enough, that means knowing how to market their stories to an expanding audience. The horror!
Eh, I disagree. More apperances by River with Eight was pretty much a given from when her involvement in Doom Coalition 2 and The Diary of River Song were announced.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 3:55:58 GMT
I think the question as posted in the first post disregards the obvious - that it can be a good story worth telling AND a marketing gimmick to stimulate sales at the same time. Big Finish are a business and Big Finish are storytellers. The two don't need to be treated as polar opposites. I'd never want them to just make pandering releases that are pure fan-service (though there's a small place for those) but I also wouldn't grudge Nick or David saying "We're on the 6th Mcgann boxset, maybe we should find a way to shake it up". We've seen that with the Benny boxsets, each having a "gimmick" or novelty aspect to capture the attention. Doesn't mean some of them aren't also fantastic releases.
I was parphasing the original letter. Believe me, I share your sentiments. It's Big Finish - the company famously known for bending over backwards for trying to appeal to all sorts of fans. The cyncisim to my mind, is incredibly unearnt (and with that refresher, surely a mindwipe didn't cross the minds of fans). There is a wonderful sincerity to Big Finish, they really are fans who know they have the best job in the world and want to tell the best stories they can. Oddly enough, that means knowing how to market their stories to an expanding audience. The horror! Yes, but a mindwipe for River I think would fall under that "cheat" category that eightelements described. That's the problem with amnesia in fiction, it's often used to curtail a character's growth rather than expand them. Think about it, if River does eventually get that wipe then her experiences with Eight are meaningless to the development of who she is because she won't remember them, so why have her at all?
Eh, I disagree. More apperances by River with Eight was pretty much a given from when her involvement in Doom Coalition 2 and The Diary of River Song were announced. If Big Finish have one weakness, it's that they use their often brilliant ideas to the point where they overstay their welcome (such as Old!Nyssa, Hector, Eight/Charley). In terms of flaws, that's probably one of the best. There's never a lack of stories. Besides, it's not as if the character doesn't have her fanbase and there's definitely a lot there to explore if they keep her away from the Doctor. However, another thing to keep in mind is that there are those of us on the other side of the fence who do not like River. I can understand the cynical (and somewhat churlish) marketing standpoint because from a certain angle it can certainly feel like it. There's certainly more to it than that though. Knowing BF, I think they were just excited to put Alex Kingston in with a classic Doctor. (Although nowadays you can never be too sure where Eight sits on that spectrum. Is Paul McGann's Doctor part of that classic line-up or is he more a NuWho incarnation now?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 8:07:30 GMT
Eh, I disagree. More apperances by River with Eight was pretty much a given from when her involvement in Doom Coalition 2 and The Diary of River Song were announced.
You say it's was always a "given" - , I don't see how that's true, there are plenty of one-off BF crossovers and events. Just because they happen once doesn't mean they're the new status quo. She didn't need to appear in DC3 right after DC2 and her own boxset with McGann.If you wanted her in, great, but her story in DC2 had a resolution so she wasn't needed going forward, she had to be written in with another contrivance. I'm not saying "I didn't want her". I'm saying "I didn't need her". Small but important distinction. As Wolfie says, there's no value in her and the 8th Doctor as a novelty now we've had it 3 times in less than a year. Compare the excitement when DC2 was announced and DC3. I guarantee you no-one was as excited for something we'd already heard twice. As Jason says the reasons for her meeting older Doctors becomes a contrivance and takes a little magic away from her own story. I don't think that matters much for a one-off like she's getting with McCoy and Baker as there's enough of a mystery factor to hear the actors play off against each other but when she's been paired with McGann so much that she may as well be a companion, I stand by my statement that its gilding the lilly. As a few of us say constantly on this forum to the posters who want the most fan-service of things in their BF, just because you can do a thing, doesn't mean you should do a thing. Having River and 8 meet 3 times in 10 months would come under that umbrella for me.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Wearer of Hats on Nov 10, 2016 9:11:09 GMT
Could it be simply that River is bloody annoying and sticking her in a series you're following meaning you can't simply skip it means you're forced to either put up with her or miss part of the plot?
|
|
aztec
Chancellery Guard
Likes: 2,849
|
Post by aztec on Nov 10, 2016 9:57:32 GMT
I wasn't a huge fan of River on TV, but I'm enjoying her appearances in Doom Coalition immensely, the character feels toned down and more 'real' and it's very interesting to see her interact with a Classic Doctor, though I do hope BF let her grow in her own stories away from any of the Doctor
I'm even tempted to say she has better chemistry with McGann than Smith...
|
|
|
Post by Sir Wearer of Hats on Nov 10, 2016 10:42:03 GMT
I wasn't a huge fan of River on TV, but I'm enjoying her appearances in Doom Coalition immensely, the character feels toned down and more 'real' and it's very interesting to see her interact with a Classic Doctor, though I do hope BF let her grow in her own stories away from any of the Doctor I'm even tempted to say she has better chemistry with McGann than Smith... Well, no matter how good an actor you are, it's hard to have sexual chemistry with someone young enough to be your son.
|
|
|
Post by icecreamdf on Nov 15, 2016 4:49:28 GMT
Silence in the Library kind of implied that River knew a whole bunch of Doctors. In Silence in the Library, River specifically described Darillium as the last time she saw "the real you, the future you I mean." That means that there is plenty of time for her to meety Doctor before 11 in between Husbands and Library. There is no continuity error here. The end of Doom Coalition 2 also strongly implied that River would be back. She's one of the main characters in Doom Coalition, just like the Master was one of the main characters in Dark Eyes. I'm glad that they are integrating River into the other ranges, instead of just keeping all the New Series stuff in their own boxsets.
|
|
|
Post by TimPendragon on Nov 15, 2016 6:02:08 GMT
Silence in the Library kind of implied that River knew a whole bunch of Doctors. In Silence in the Library, River specifically described Darillium as the last time she saw "the real you, the future you I mean." That means that there is plenty of time for her to meety Doctor before 11 in between Husbands and Library. There is no continuity error here. The end of Doom Coalition 2 also strongly implied that River would be back. She's one of the main characters in Doom Coalition, just like the Master was one of the main characters in Dark Eyes. I'm glad that they are integrating River into the other ranges, instead of just keeping all the New Series stuff in their own boxsets. Silence/Forests only really imply that River knows Doctors after Ten. She specifically tells him "You're young...younger than I've ever seen you..." meaning that she hasn't met his previous incarnations. By the time River shows up again, the concept has...altered, somewhat, and appears to undergo further revision over the course of Series 5-7. So, as Moffat's ideas about her grew/changed on up through at least "A Good Man Goes to War," let alone "The Husbands of River Song," we can't necessarily trust her comments in Silence in the Library remain accurate. I love River as originally presented, and I love the fire and passion and humor and class that Alex Kingston always brings to the role. Where I lose it is when Moffat uses her only as a plot device instead of a character (something he does with most, if not all, of his companions to date). If we go by only what we see on our TV screens, River has no life apart from the Doctor, and that lessens her immensely as a character. While I'm perfectly content with her occasionally showing up with classic Doctors (I'd love to see her with Five, honestly), I'd much rather BF focus on stories about her without the Doctor. When treated as an actual person instead of a Macguffin, she can be an immensely interesting and entertaining character that is just about the Doctor's equal, and can certainly carry a series on her own. All that being said, the 24-year-long night on Darillium gives her plenty of time for more adventures (with or without Twelve). You know neither one of them could stay put in one place that long. They just have to come back.
|
|
|
Post by xeryus63 on Nov 15, 2016 19:52:00 GMT
I think the secret should would be to use River Song sparingly Otherwise it's becomes overuse and fails to have any impact
|
|
|
Post by nottenst on Nov 16, 2016 22:23:52 GMT
River's timeline doesn't as far as I can see have any room for her to meet other Doctor's, things she's said and done and indeed The Doctors on words and actions just mean she doesn't know the other Doctors, the prospect of stories with her and other Doctors leave me feeling that the stories she's already been in are being robbed of any significance they had, and me feeling that I bought into something that will become a mess. I got no problem with hearing more stores with River, but I really would prefer she stuck to her established TV timeline. In The Husbands of River Song, she thought that a Doctor was going to be on Mendorax Dellora. She had a bunch of photos of all of the previous incarnations of the Doctor. So, at this time she knew what he looked like and may have met some of them.
|
|
|
Post by Timelord007 on Nov 16, 2016 23:10:19 GMT
I actually prefer River in Doom Coalition than any of her tv appearances barring Silence In The Library.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Cannuck on Nov 17, 2016 1:11:33 GMT
I think I can shed a little light on the question of how someone couldn't be excited over River's involvement in Big Finish. I do understand that many people love River but if there's one character that has annoyed me more than Adric, it's her! This, of course, is only my opinion and it is not to devalue the opinions of others who do love the character. My reaction comes from the overt romanticism of the premise. I had no problem with the kiss in the 1996 movie but I really think it went too far on TV beginning with Ten and the whole Rose thing, and hitting its repeated climax which each increasingly OTT River appearance. And the whole smug, self-referential "hello sweetie" thing really grates on me. As you can no doubt tell, I'm not a fan and found her to be an unwanted (from my point of view and probably not yours) intrusion into the mindscape of Big Finish (that goes for you too Adric!). We can't like all characters and some will like characters that other people don't so I hope you don't take this as a furious rant. I really just wanted to explain for those of us who are not "excited by the prospect". I do agree with other comments in this thread that Big Finish is committed to the fans AND to making money/growing their company, and these two things are not incompatible. I have HUGE respect for the business they've built so more power to them if this is working for them!
|
|
|
Post by mrperson on Nov 17, 2016 18:23:52 GMT
I don't think the TV show did a good job of defining the character anyway, as Moffat seemed to change his mind about who she was actually supposed to be be from episode to episode and season to season. She goes from a more cautious sort of archaeologist who has a past with a future Doctor in silence/forest, to some kind of action hero who mainly does what she pleases whenever, can fly the TARDIS better, alternately has her own means of time travel, and who happens to be the Doctor's (second?) wife and child of companions. He didn't even neatly stick to the concept of their always "meeting in the wrong order." I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if S10 involves the Doctor extracting her from the library computer - she's the only character to actually die and still remain (mostly) dead.
I don't have a problem with the concept of BF having River appear. As is almost always the case, I trust the character to improve under BF.
|
|