Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 10:28:13 GMT
It's the same person, only a few months age difference. You clearly aren't listening, and Moffat is starting a arguement over something that didn't happen! I am listening, and trying to make the point that you're splitting hairs because chauvanism in the treatment of a female character was common in late sixties who. Trying to argue the Doctor shouldn't talk about Polly dusting this Christmas because he never asked her to make tea in his first incarnation is a bit random at best.
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 2, 2017 10:35:00 GMT
In this instance yes there's a cultural shift lately where equality issues must be addressed by Drama it seems.
I very much doubt Moffatt on his own has said "well the obvious difference between them is I can make 1st Doctor a chauvinist" without someone else saying "difference in gender views is a hot button topic right now"
Regards
mark6873
Are you saying Moffat was forced to add that line in the Xmas Special? I don't know possibly.
BTW after the Regeneration will you still be watching?
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 10:36:10 GMT
You clearly aren't listening, and Moffat is starting a arguement over something that didn't happen! I am listening, and trying to make the point that you're splitting hairs because chauvanism in the treatment of a female character was common in late sixties who.Trying to argue the Doctor shouldn't talk about Polly dusting this Christmas because he never asked her to make tea in his first incarnation is a bit random at best. That is always true, but not by the First Doctor! The Doctor fights prejudices, and unjust cruelty etc. You're suggesting that, off camera, the First Doctor was a chauvinist, simply because the show had chauvanistic charaters!
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Aug 2, 2017 10:42:55 GMT
Why do I get the sense this is just making a mountain out of a molehill and in the end it'll probably only be a line or two.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 10:44:38 GMT
Why do I get the sense this is just making a mountain out of a molehill and in the end it'll probably only be a line or two. Probably because that is exactly what will happen - we shall see
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Aug 2, 2017 10:54:04 GMT
Why do I get the sense this is just making a mountain out of a molehill and in the end it'll probably only be a line or two. Because paul has something of an unusual fixation with Moffat. If that same line was written by Bob Holmes, he'd be praising it as undying genius.
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 10:55:02 GMT
Why do I get the sense this is just making a mountain out of a molehill and in the end it'll probably only be a line or two. Moffats mentioned his "line or two" in interviews! He's trying to make a point! But, why is he getting a character to act out of character? Say things he never said, or would say?
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 10:56:52 GMT
Why do I get the sense this is just making a mountain out of a molehill and in the end it'll probably only be a line or two. Because paul has something of an unusual fixation with Moffat. If that same line was written by Bob Holmes, he'd be praising it as undying genius. At least, Holmes wrote stories that made sense!
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Aug 2, 2017 11:00:13 GMT
Why do I get the sense this is just making a mountain out of a molehill and in the end it'll probably only be a line or two. Moffats mentioned his "line or two" in interviews! He's trying to make a point! But, why is he getting a character to act out of character? Say things he never said, or would say? The interview you initially cited was of David Bradley, not Moffat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 11:03:13 GMT
The Space Pirates made perfect sense, I'm sure. It was also a good deal duller than anything Steven Moffat has ever written.
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 2, 2017 11:07:47 GMT
Just remembered a better in show example
In the 5 Doctors he sends Tegan off to make the refreshments and as a modern woman she considers it chauvinist.
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 11:11:52 GMT
Just remembered a better in show example In the 5 Doctors he sends Tegan off to make the refreshments and as a modern woman she considers it chauvinist. Regards mark687 Not William Hartnell. Not 1963 to 1966!
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 2, 2017 11:13:47 GMT
Just remembered a better in show example In the 5 Doctors he sends Tegan off to make the refreshments and as a modern woman she considers it chauvinist. Regards mark687 Not William Hartnell. Not 1963 to 1966! Same character even if the original Actor was Dead!
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 11:15:51 GMT
Not William Hartnell. Not 1963 to 1966! Same character the Actor was Dead!
Regards
mark687
Maybe it's the only episode Moffat has watched of the First Doctor?
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 2, 2017 11:19:14 GMT
Same character the Actor was Dead!
Regards
mark687
Maybe it's the only episode Moffat has watched of the First Doctor? Give me strength.
So will you be watching the show after the Regeneration?
Regards
Regards
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 11:21:35 GMT
Maybe it's the only episode Moffat has watched of the First Doctor? Give me strength.
So will you be watching the show after the Regeneration?
Regards
Regards
God, no! I've struggled with Capaldi and Moffat! Chibnalls writing is awful, and I don't want a woman Doctor Who.
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Aug 2, 2017 11:25:39 GMT
Give me strength.
So will you be watching the show after the Regeneration?
Regards
Regards
God, no! I've struggled with Capaldi and Moffat! Chibnalls writing is awful, and I don't want a woman Doctor Who. Well at least this is the last EP that we'll be going down the conversational Rabbit Hole on.
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 11:37:18 GMT
God, no! I've struggled with Capaldi and Moffat! Chibnalls writing is awful, and I don't want a woman Doctor Who. Well at least this is the last EP that we'll be going down the conversational Rabbit Hole on.
Regards
mark687
I'll just sit by the side and read all the infighting!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 11:52:32 GMT
Well at least this is the last EP that we'll be going down the conversational Rabbit Hole on.
Regards
mark687
I'll just sit by the side and read all the infighting! You mean you'll stop posting? Actually, most posters here have a healthy respect for other peoples' opinions and don't resort to infighting. I'll resist the tempation to say you should try that sometime!
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Aug 2, 2017 11:56:05 GMT
I'll just sit by the side and read all the infighting! You mean you'll stop posting? Actually, most posters here have a healthy respect for other peoples' opinions and don't resort to infighting. I'll resist the tempation to say you should try that sometime! There already is infighting about the gender issue!
|
|