|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Oct 25, 2018 10:19:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Oct 25, 2018 10:25:11 GMT
We were saving it for you!
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
|
Post by stcoop on Oct 25, 2018 10:54:41 GMT
How can something be delayed if a date was never announced in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Oct 25, 2018 11:11:06 GMT
How can something be delayed if a date was never announced in the first place? Because fans expect a series every year. |
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Oct 25, 2018 11:12:24 GMT
We were saving it for you!
Regards
mark687
Ohh, dear! |
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Oct 25, 2018 11:24:05 GMT
How can something be delayed if a date was never announced in the first place? Because fans expect a series every year. Correction Something would be expected every year, but since the RTD end of Era specials the amounts have never been guaranteed.
To do nothing next year after the push of this year would be risky IMO, but we don't Know for sure if that's the case.
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Oct 25, 2018 12:59:41 GMT
How can something be delayed if a date was never announced in the first place? Time travel. You go back and announce the start date after you've written about the delay, in case anyone checks.
Or even easier, if your headline is (sigh, yet again) clickbait.
Even the sub-head reads 'but sources say that may not mean the series skips 2019'. And the article reads 'a reduced shooting period might not mean a delay even if Doctor Who does start filming a little later than it did for series 11.' |
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Oct 25, 2018 13:53:55 GMT
So one anonymous BBC source said one thing, another says a different thing.
This is some impressive hedging of bets.
|
|
|
|
Post by ollychops on Oct 25, 2018 16:43:01 GMT
There's a RadioTimes article debunking this rumour, or, at least questioning how legitimate it is. |
|
