|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 24, 2016 1:15:42 GMT
Both cited as the beginning of the end of Classic Who, and a great crises that shook public and fan faith, which one comes out on top?
|
|
|
Post by icecreamdf on Dec 24, 2016 2:01:52 GMT
I'd say Trial is better. It went down hill once Peri left, but Mysterious Planet and Mindwarp weren't bad. Season 24 didn't have any very good episodes. I may be biased though, because I can't stand Mel.
|
|
shutupbanks
Castellan
There’s a horror movie called Alien? That’s really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you.
Likes: 5,677
|
Post by shutupbanks on Dec 24, 2016 3:26:01 GMT
I really enjoyed Mysterious Planet and about half of each of the remaining stories in Trial but it really went downhill as the season went on. However, while I think Season 24 started off badly it grew on me as it went on and it really felt like a rejuvenated show by the end of Dragonfire. Unfortunately, there's not a single one of them where I don't have a "WTAF?" moment at some of the choices made by the production team. 23 loses points for being a muddled production when - by rights - it should have been a barnstormer. But it had that magnificent first episode (23 is FANTASTIC at first episodes) 24 had a dud opener (but it looked great) but seemed like a more competent show by the end (PT, DatB and Dragonfire had solid worldbuilding (Delta and Billy's romance and the slavish debt that Dragonfire owes to Aliens notwithstanding).
For me it comes down to the performances and Trial wins out there: nobody makes me squirm in embarrassment quite the way that Richard Briers as the possessed caretaker does (probably the only dud moment in a wonderfully entertaining career).
On the other hand, this question is asking me if I'd like to choose between a cheeseburger or a bacon 'n' egg mcmuffin when I'd really rather have a proper meal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2016 3:42:42 GMT
They were both pretty troubled years for the programme, but back-to-back...
Season 24 was an unfortunate animal. Time and the Rani is really only worth watching for Kate O'Mara's performance as the titular character, Spaceport Fear is pretty much everything Paradise Towers nearly was, Delta and the Bannermen was forgettable and Dragonfire is marred by some pretty glaring production flaws. The show's ethos during at that year was pretty awful, the Doctor's characterisation started off badly (mixed metaphors and all) and only managed a marginal improvement by the end of the season. All the polish first garnered in 1984 has completely evaporated, our main characters are a mess and their supporting cast don't fare much better either.
Season 23 on the other hand feels like a return to form in some respects. The production values have shot down between Revelation of the Daleks and The Mysterious Planet, but the Trial feels like something necessary for the programme at the time. The Doctor and Peri's characterisations are far better than what they were in 1985, the former has the twinkle of his comic counterpart and the latter has plenty of do in lieu of standing around looking helpless. They don't quite have the same enthusiasm of writing that the Voyager saga or Profits of Doom does, but things are staying afloat under extremely difficult circumstances.
In exploring the show's past, present and future via its first three stories, Bob Holmes's first entry feels like quintessential Who. Nothing particularly ambitious, just an old fashioned tale like the nostalgic remember (fitting considering its resemblance to The Krotons). Mindwarp explores the morbid side of the show that had popped up in Davison's last year and is probably the best looking of the four stories. I think it was a mistake to make the Sixth Doctor so untrustworthy given misgivings about his first year, but to have it framed by the uncertainty of the trial manages to bring out a more sympathetic side to him. We get to see him shaken by the Valeyard's "shock tactics" and genuinely heartbroken by Peri's unfortunate fate. It's the most human we get to see his incarnation on television and a stellar moment of acting for Colin Baker and Michael Jayston.
Terror of the Vervoids is where things start to go awry, the story in question was written without the trial scenes, leading to no small amount of padding from what should now have been a vital aspect of the story. Instead we're wading through a pretty decent story waiting for what eventually comes with The Ultimate Foe. I can't help but feel that P.J. Hammond's Paradise 5 would have been the better entry for what they were trying to do with Lorelei having a connection to the Valeyard that tied into the present through more than just further distorted evidence. The final act of the story feels exactly like what it is -- unfinished. The Valeyard's lair in the Matrix is destroyed, the Doctor goes off with Mel and there's no real climax.
But the show still feels as though it's going somewhere, you can see the Sixth Doctor's third year being lined up in those final moments, but there's no such optimism with the Seventh Doctor and Ace. Irony of ironies is that it was switched around, we got an excellent opening story in Remembrance of the Daleks and had to wait a couple decades for The Marian Conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by ulyssessarcher on Dec 24, 2016 10:58:27 GMT
Season 23 what if?
Oh wait, that's series one of the lost stories.
I vote for Trial, just because of the crappy regeneration in season 24.
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Dec 24, 2016 13:51:10 GMT
Unfortunately, they are both pretty poor.
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 24, 2016 13:55:54 GMT
But the show still feels as though it's going somewhere, you can see the Sixth Doctor's third year being lined up in those final moments, but there's no such optimism with the Seventh Doctor and Ace. Irony of ironies is that it was switched around, we got an excellent opening story in Remembrance of the Daleks and had to wait a couple decades for The Marian Conspiracy. I wonder if they hadn't done Trial and tried to retroconvert the original Season 23 into the new one. Would Nightmare Fair or Hollows or Yellow Fever work as shorter multiparters?
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Dec 24, 2016 14:26:58 GMT
Trial: Baker Jayston, and Bellingham do quite well with the courtroom material and Mindwarp is decent.
Regards
mark687
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2016 14:27:47 GMT
I found Series 23 to be flawed but enjoyable. The style was very much that of Series 22, but heavily diluted. The Doctor was no longer outspoken and acerbic, and the (alleged) violence of Series 22 was heavily scaled down ... which made the truly shocking exit of Peri so much more powerful. In the middle of a fairly standard collection of stories, Peri's final scenes pack a punch unparallelled even to this day.
I thought series 24 was a huge improvement. Forwards-looking, a refreshing new Doctor, and a new direction for the show. No longer constrained by the shadow of Michael Grade's words, no longer shackled by continuity - just the Doctor and his best friend having adventures. True, 'Time and the Rani' remains fairly incomprehensible, but I loved the individuality and style of the following three stories, which paved the way for the classic series' terrific final two series.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2016 17:51:12 GMT
I wonder if they hadn't done Trial and tried to retroconvert the original Season 23 into the new one. Would Nightmare Fair or Hollows or Yellow Fever work as shorter multiparters? I can definitely see either The Nightmare Fair or Yellow Fever being condensed primarily due to budgetary concerns. The latter would have been particularly difficult to manage, Singapore wasn't cheap even back then and Bob Holmes was a bit wary about period pieces. A futuristic setting may have worked to its advantage in this case. Maybe there could have been trims done to The Hollows of Time too? It's difficult to tell by its audio counterpart. When I first sat down to listen to it I was expecting something a lot more in line with The Renaissance Man, I rather liked the idea of Pinacotheca's chronology pools in the library being attacked by "bookworms". It would have made for a pretty interesting adventure, starting out in a quiet English village only to soon find out it's just one of a multitude of special times and spaces preserved in posterity.
|
|
|
Post by anothermanicmondas on Dec 25, 2016 10:19:05 GMT
Trial - Colin was in wonderful form throughout Sylvester didn't really get going until season 25
|
|
|
Post by doctorkernow on Dec 29, 2016 22:50:22 GMT
Hello again. What a dilemma, Trial or Panto? A teenager at the time, I felt that poor Colin Baker was badly served during most of his time on TV Who. I found the Trial interminable.
I thought it a major error to have a trial story that on screen mirroring the off screen trial. To me it felt poorly conceived. I would have preferred separate stories without the irritating interruptions of the dull trial scenes.
There were a few bright moments. The Doctor and Peri had settled into a great team. Peri's death at the end of episode 8 was a real shock and well-executed. Even the Vervoid story had some good points. Poor Bonnie Langford again given very little to work with. The last two episodes were a mess. Overblown, very theatrical and at times incomprehensible. Though again, there were nuggets of gold. The Doctor's speech condemning his people's duplicity was beautifully delivered.
I consider Season 23 a wasted opportunity. It did little to showcase Colin's Doctor. If he had had stories like his early stories for Big Finish with Evelyn he may have had a better outcome.
I tend to ignore Colin's TV stories and have really enjoyed how his Doctor has developed on audio. His stories with Peri have been a revelation. Also to give him an older companion was a stroke of genius. Evelyn Smythe is a super companion and complements the verbose and bombastic Sixie wonderfully. Charlotte Pollard also made a good foil for the Doctor.
I am still enjoying my listen through of the Six Doctor on Big Finish. The stories prove what a good Doctor Colin is and long may he continue. Season 23 is now a distant nightmare...
|
|
|
Post by doctorkernow on Dec 29, 2016 23:13:47 GMT
Hello again. Now Panto Season 24. Well I was just pleased to be rid of that awful courtroom.
My experience of Season 24 was subtly different to most people. I saw that season in black and white and still haven't seen 3 of the stories in colour!
Now this means I avoided the brilliantly lighting, garish sets and bright green infants.
I wasn't distracted by the visuals and concentrated on the whimsical and strange stories.
Well, they were like licorice allsorts weren't they? More musings tomorrow, dog is whining to go out...
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Dec 30, 2016 11:06:44 GMT
I watched Trial in one sitting and really enjoyed it. Bizarrely I actually liked Mel on her first appearance (her enthusiasm is a nice antidote to all the whining companions of the eighties) though her screams do grate.
The courtroom scenes were actually quite entertaining for me, especially when they're cutting into Mysterious Planet (which is hardly the most thrilling of stories). Colin Baker and Michael Jayston manage to make those scenes.
I haven't seen any of Season 24, so can't judge in comparison but I was pleasantly surprised by Trial (except for that bloody love heart at the end)
|
|
|
Post by doctorkernow on Dec 30, 2016 20:03:41 GMT
Hello again. Now, Panto Season 24. Sylvester McCoy was a curious Doctor. He was charmingly comic and became a more sinister manipulator during Seasons 25/26.
I remember an article absolutely trashing McCoy's interpretation of the part by a member of DWAS in the Daily Mail I was delivering on my paper round.
The stories were interesting and told with enthusiasm. Unfortunately, there was some woeful mistakes made when producing these stories. I used to record the soundtrack to listen to and I enjoyed them more without the visual distraction.
Time and the Rani was my least favourite. Though I liked the Rani's bubble traps. The Rani was entertaining, but her cunning plan was unfathomable!
Paradise Towers had some great moments. I liked the attempt to create a dystopic society. Seeing it in black/white made some of the scenes with the robotic cleaners really creepy.
Now, Richard Briers as the unhinged Chief Caretaker I enjoyed. When he was taken over by the nasty in the cellar I think the idea was to show the alien having difficulty controlling his new body but it just didn't work!
All the performances in this are extreme and totally ridiculous at times. I think they have to be because of the gruesome nature of the plot. They did not want to get into trouble like in Season 22. The music did not help the action on screen, it was too jolly. Mark Ayre's more subtle approach might have worked better.
I liked Dragonfire more than Delta on first viewing because it felt more serious and more like old-fashioned Who. I liked Edward Peel's icy Kane. I thought Ace, a good contrast with Mel. The plot was basic but had some great moments between Kane and the other characters. I liked the music too, much less frenetic than in Paradise Towers.
Delta was a great romp. The fifties were well-realised and for once the music fitted well with the on-screen action. The story was charming albeit with a few holes. Any misfires can be forgiven due to the sheer chutzpah of the production.
If Andrew Cartmel hadn't gone down the sinister manipulator route; this story shows an alternative approach for McCoy's Doctor. A threat dealt with by a Doctor, outwardly comedic but brave and capable too. He shows real ability to rally those around him to help, but he is still the outsider.
McCoy's Season 24 had some real clunking errors but the direction of travel had potential. Three new writers, a comedic but competent Doctor, an antagonistic but believable companion to work with in future seasons and a return to unpredictable crazy adventures.
What did not help at all was the stupid and deliberate decision to schedule it opposite Corrie. There was only going to be one winner...
This period in the show's history provokes strong feelings in me. I like both Doctors. I feel both were treated badly by the powers that be in the BBC. Season 24 wins because of its inventive, although not always successfully realised ideas.
|
|
|
Post by constonks on Dec 31, 2016 5:06:24 GMT
Trial of a Time Lord isn't amazing, but it has lots of fantastic moments IMO and the idea itself deserves respect and when I rewatched it recently (in preparation for the release of The Last Adventure), I found myself enjoying the first twelve episodes quite a bit.
The Ultimate Foe is mostly garbage. There are positives here and there, but I don't feel like I'm being unfair when I say it's largely without merit - in the same way that The Last of the Time Lords was a crappy ending to the Season 3 Master Trilogy. Of course, in the defense of the Season 23 production team, it wasn't intended to go that way. TUF is a hodgepodge because it's a last-minute saving throw that didn't quite connect. But, hey, they TRIED.
Season 24? Well, I remember really liking Delta and the Bannermen but I haven't gone back to it since. Actually, I haven't re-watched any of the Season 24 stories in their entirety, although I have skimmed through the first episode of Dragonfire just to watch the Ace bits. Time and the Rani is perhaps the lowest point of Who for me, and I couldn't tell you much I remember about Paradise Towers except that Red Kangs are, apparently, best.
Personally, I lean towards Colin on this one. Season 24's not all bad, but I genuinely appreciate the ambition of Trial and enjoyed both watches of it - and will probably enjoy a third someday.
EDIT: Oh I forgot the "truly corrupt" speech is from TUF. That would be the "positives here and there" I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Dec 31, 2016 10:20:23 GMT
Trial of a Time Lord isn't amazing, but it has lots of fantastic moments IMO and the idea itself deserves respect and when I rewatched it recently (in preparation for the release of The Last Adventure), I found myself enjoying the first twelve episodes quite a bit. The Ultimate Foe is mostly garbage. There are positives here and there, but I don't feel like I'm being unfair when I say it's largely without merit - in the same way that The Last of the Time Lords was a crappy ending to the Season 3 Master Trilogy. Of course, in the defense of the Season 23 production team, it wasn't intended to go that way. TUF is a hodgepodge because it's a last-minute saving throw that didn't quite connect. But, hey, they TRIED. Season 24? Well, I remember really liking Delta and the Bannermen but I haven't gone back to it since. Actually, I haven't re-watched any of the Season 24 stories in their entirety, although I have skimmed through the first episode of Dragonfire just to watch the Ace bits. Time and the Rani is perhaps the lowest point of Who for me, and I couldn't tell you much I remember about Paradise Towers except that Red Kangs are, apparently, best. Personally, I lean towards Colin on this one. Season 24's not all bad, but I genuinely appreciate the ambition of Trial and enjoyed both watches of it - and will probably enjoy a third someday. EDIT: Oh I forgot the "truly corrupt" speech is from TUF. That would be the "positives here and there" I suppose. The first half of Ultimate Foe's pretty good, not amazing by no means not terrible. The second half isn't so coherent, essentially just running on the spot in the Matrix until the Valeyard decides to kill all the Time Lords in the courtroom for ...reasons with a ...machine. And then the love heart and the off-screen revolution. But at least they tried, and to their credit its still got good ideas (the repeating cycle of Mr Popperknick's bureaucracy is quite good idea, until he turns out to be the Valeyard-why does the Valeyard bother to do that?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2017 1:36:36 GMT
Trial of a Time Lord isn't amazing, but it has lots of fantastic moments IMO and the idea itself deserves respect and when I rewatched it recently (in preparation for the release of The Last Adventure), I found myself enjoying the first twelve episodes quite a bit. The Ultimate Foe is mostly garbage. There are positives here and there, but I don't feel like I'm being unfair when I say it's largely without merit - in the same way that The Last of the Time Lords was a crappy ending to the Season 3 Master Trilogy. Of course, in the defense of the Season 23 production team, it wasn't intended to go that way. TUF is a hodgepodge because it's a last-minute saving throw that didn't quite connect. But, hey, they TRIED. Season 24? Well, I remember really liking Delta and the Bannermen but I haven't gone back to it since. Actually, I haven't re-watched any of the Season 24 stories in their entirety, although I have skimmed through the first episode of Dragonfire just to watch the Ace bits. Time and the Rani is perhaps the lowest point of Who for me, and I couldn't tell you much I remember about Paradise Towers except that Red Kangs are, apparently, best. Personally, I lean towards Colin on this one. Season 24's not all bad, but I genuinely appreciate the ambition of Trial and enjoyed both watches of it - and will probably enjoy a third someday. EDIT: Oh I forgot the "truly corrupt" speech is from TUF. That would be the "positives here and there" I suppose. The first half of Ultimate Foe's pretty good, not amazing by no means not terrible. The second half isn't so coherent, essentially just running on the spot in the Matrix until the Valeyard decides to kill all the Time Lords in the courtroom for ...reasons with a ...machine. From the Valeyard's perspective, this is a perfect opportunity to wipe out the Court of Inquiry and blame it on the uprising. The Time Lords at the trial are the only ones who seem to be aware of who exactly the Valeyard truly is and without a stable High Council in place, there's adequate opportunity to seize the title of Lord President or its emergency powers equivalent. It's not exactly articulated in the story, but if he were sensible, I reckon that'd be his evil plan.
|
|
|
Post by Timelord007 on Jan 1, 2017 9:59:06 GMT
I loved Trial Of A Timelord & thought it a unique idea & one o enjoyed watching aged 11 & now at 41.
|
|
|
Post by Timelord007 on Jan 1, 2017 9:59:19 GMT
4 unique stories with a intriguing mystery & the Valeyardds true identity was a clever twist.
|
|