|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 10, 2017 9:49:45 GMT
My guess is BBC America isn't worried about boycotts. Orphan Black lasted five years, so they already have a viewership that's happy to watch a female-led Scifi show. And wasn't Orphan Black critically acclaimed? I never watched it because I can only watch so much. Indeed it was.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Dec 10, 2017 12:30:36 GMT
If foreign viewers stop watching, the foreign channel won't buy the show from the BBC. The BBC won't make any money from overseas sales. Their 'boycott' isn't hollow My guess is BBC America isn't worried about boycotts. Orphan Black lasted five years, so they already have a viewership that's happy to watch a female-led Scifi show. Orphan Black didn't suddenly change the lead to a male half way through the series.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2017 12:44:49 GMT
My guess is BBC America isn't worried about boycotts. Orphan Black lasted five years, so they already have a viewership that's happy to watch a female-led Scifi show. Orphan Black didn't suddenly change the lead to a male half way through the series. We are halfway through Doctor Who? Only another 54 years to go folks!
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Dec 10, 2017 13:01:01 GMT
Orphan Black didn't suddenly change the lead to a male half way through the series. We are halfway through Doctor Who? Only another 54 years to go folks! Don't be ignorant, you know fine what I meant.
|
|
shutupbanks
Castellan
There’s a horror movie called Alien? That’s really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you.
Likes: 5,677
|
Post by shutupbanks on Dec 10, 2017 14:05:36 GMT
My guess is BBC America isn't worried about boycotts. Orphan Black lasted five years, so they already have a viewership that's happy to watch a female-led Scifi show. Orphan Black didn't suddenly change the lead to a male half way through the series. "Suddenly." We've had hints dropped since 2011!
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Dec 10, 2017 14:59:37 GMT
Orphan Black didn't suddenly change the lead to a male half way through the series. "Suddenly." We've had hints dropped since 2011! Didn't know they changed the cast from female to male in Orphan Black.
|
|
bobod
Chancellery Guard
Likes: 2,759
|
Post by bobod on Dec 10, 2017 15:10:25 GMT
"Suddenly." We've had hints dropped since 2011! Didn't know they changed the cast from female to male in Orphan Black. Don't be ignorant, you know fine what he meant.
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 10, 2017 15:11:04 GMT
"Suddenly." We've had hints dropped since 2011! Didn't know they changed the cast from female to male in Orphan Black. Don't be ignorant, you know fine what he meant. (Yeah, not nice when it's done to you, is it? If you're going to argue, have a little decorum and restraint)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2017 15:22:05 GMT
We are halfway through Doctor Who? Only another 54 years to go folks! Don't be ignorant, you know fine what I meant. What do you mean? Doctor Who hasn't suddenly changed the lead character halfway through the series at all. This has been hinted at for a long time, given time to develop & the lead character, unlike those in Orphan Black, has at their core the ability to regenerate into another person. Please make more coherent arguments rather than insulting people. It would appear you are the ignorant one.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Dec 10, 2017 16:32:30 GMT
Don't be ignorant, you know fine what I meant. What do you mean? Doctor Who hasn't suddenly changed the lead character halfway through the series at all. This has been hinted at for a long time, given time to develop & the lead character, unlike those in Orphan Black, has at their core the ability to regenerate into another person. Please make more coherent arguments rather than insulting people. It would appear you are the ignorant one. I'm out of here. You can keep your pettiness!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2017 19:14:51 GMT
What do you mean? Doctor Who hasn't suddenly changed the lead character halfway through the series at all. This has been hinted at for a long time, given time to develop & the lead character, unlike those in Orphan Black, has at their core the ability to regenerate into another person. Please make more coherent arguments rather than insulting people. It would appear you are the ignorant one. I'm out of here. You can keep your pettiness! Petty! You accuse someone of being ignorant then don't like it when they challenge your opinion. Hahaha!
|
|
|
Post by Timelord007 on Dec 11, 2017 9:33:43 GMT
Consider this a sister thread to masterdoctor's 'negative reactions to 13'. As Jodie's time nears, and fan reaction will heat up again, I think there's something that needs to be addressed: Demographics change. Notice, a lot of terms like 'real fans' or 'hardcore fans' or 'you owe us' get thrown around by sectors of fandom. These are people who believe that their contiinued support of the programme makes them the priority audience, and that they are the one and only lfie blood of the series. If they go, it's over. My simple question is thus: do they think that every person who watched Who in 1963 was still watching in 1973, let alone 1983? Did every person who watched Hartnell hang around until McCoy, never mind Eccleston and Tennant? I hope not. Here's the thing fandom never wants to hear: it's replaceable. Audiences change and new ones can fill in gaps, if and when, they come up. Every major franchise has had to do this at some point: clear the cobwebs to let in new life. I guarantee that less than a fraction of the 8 million plus who tuned in to 'Rose' in 05 were veterans, for example. Most of Tenant's lauded viewing figures: will bet money many were kids and casuals. Getting back in line with the OP after detouring on ratings, of course there isn't a one-size-fits-all answer: not everyone who dislikes Jodie is a sexist, and not everyone who wants her is a brainwashed femininazi. Ideologues are bad, no matter what end of the political spectrum they're on, and that reductive approach kills discussion, the lifeblood of fandom. Nonetheless, the pro-side isn't really doing much. The anti-crowd are really the ones trying to fan flames and the BBC and Chibnall's approach is denying them that oxygen. Even then, what tends to be lost is, well, the kids: they don't have the baggage we do. They can come to Jodie with new eyes, and it'll be itneresting to hear them in ten years. Well I've never hidden the fact that i never wanted a female Doctor & it's those fans who welcome it who i have found to be the most abusive, just because i don't want a female Doctor doesn't mean I'm sexist i just prefer it to remain a male, if Jodies performances are good & can change my opinion I'll be the first to say i was wrong. Your post was excellently put my friend.
|
|
shutupbanks
Castellan
There’s a horror movie called Alien? That’s really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you.
Likes: 5,677
|
Post by shutupbanks on Dec 11, 2017 10:11:02 GMT
(Apologies for dropping in and out of this conversation)
This forum is the most involved in fandom I've ever been in my life (and I've written articles about tv shows and books that I love). I've avoided it mostly because while the faces of fans may change, their utterances and behaviour remain the same. And it bugs me that some people refuse to accept any kind of change to things that they love. It bugs me triply that people hate change in Doctor Who, a show that changes its setting every few episodes, its supporting cast every couple of seasons and its lead actor every few years. So, while it might "feel different this time," the "moment has been prepared for." I believe the show will continue to bring in new fans as it has always slumped at times before but usually managed to recover, even if it has taken time.
And as I said above, this change is something that has been hinted at for six years - almost 10% of the life of the show. And while I get that there is a lot of hostility directed at any actor that takes on the role - I'm old enough to remember people complaining that Peter Davison was too young for the part and remember feeling weird about Tom Baker taking over from Jon Pertwee - there's a fair lashing of sexism directed at the change. That angers me and I do look suspiciously at people who complain about the character being a woman because it is different from an actor being too young/ old/ left-handed/ tattooed/ Scottish since we have seen a lot of ugliness directed at women lately. My aplogies to those who are offended by that stance but it is borne out of my previous experience and it will take a lot before it changes.
|
|
aztec
Chancellery Guard
Likes: 2,849
|
Post by aztec on Dec 11, 2017 11:28:26 GMT
Although I wasn't actively clamouring for a female Doctor, equally I've never really been opposed to the idea, the Doctor (in the Classic series at least) never struck me as an especially male/sexual character and changing the character gender won't have much negative effect on how I enjoy/perceive the show (that will be down to the storylines) thinking if over since the announcement I'm actually rather intrigued/excited to see how this refreshes the show, I adored Capaldi's Doctor so much I'm glad Jodie's going to be totally different, at the end of the day it's just a slightly daft, camp family TV series, there's nearly 60 years of stories to watch/listen/read and if I don't enjoy the 13th Doctor (after giving her a fair go) I'll just tune out and stick with the Doctors I do like.
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 12, 2017 0:42:21 GMT
(Apologies for dropping in and out of this conversation) This forum is the most involved in fandom I've ever been in my life (and I've written articles about tv shows and books that I love). I've avoided it mostly because while the faces of fans may change, their utterances and behaviour remain the same. And it bugs me that some people refuse to accept any kind of change to things that they love. It bugs me triply that people hate change in Doctor Who, a show that changes its setting every few episodes, its supporting cast every couple of seasons and its lead actor every few years. So, while it might "feel different this time," the "moment has been prepared for." I believe the show will continue to bring in new fans as it has always slumped at times before but usually managed to recover, even if it has taken time. And on that change, something else to consider: this whole business about 'agenda' informing Chibnall's ecision feels at odds with his behaviour: wouldn't someone trying to push a progressive narrative be standing on a soapbox, asking for public praise and deification? Wouldn't he be on chat shows, bemoaning issues of women's representation (not belittling our female members, just throwing out an observation)? What's Chibnall actually doing? Ignoring the internet, social justice very much included, and not courting media attention ala Feig and GB 2016, or certain members of Marvel's comic staff.
|
|
|
Post by newt5996 on Dec 12, 2017 22:46:59 GMT
(Apologies for dropping in and out of this conversation) This forum is the most involved in fandom I've ever been in my life (and I've written articles about tv shows and books that I love). I've avoided it mostly because while the faces of fans may change, their utterances and behaviour remain the same. And it bugs me that some people refuse to accept any kind of change to things that they love. It bugs me triply that people hate change in Doctor Who, a show that changes its setting every few episodes, its supporting cast every couple of seasons and its lead actor every few years. So, while it might "feel different this time," the "moment has been prepared for." I believe the show will continue to bring in new fans as it has always slumped at times before but usually managed to recover, even if it has taken time. And on that change, something else to consider: this whole business about 'agenda' informing Chibnall's ecision feels at odds with his behaviour: wouldn't someone trying to push a progressive narrative be standing on a soapbox, asking for public praise and deification? Wouldn't he be on chat shows, bemoaning issues of women's representation (not belittling our female members, just throwing out an observation)? What's Chibnall actually doing? Ignoring the internet, social justice very much included, and not courting media attention ala Feig and GB 2016, or certain members of Marvel's comic staff. And wasn't one of his comments before the reveal when asked if he would change the gender and before Whitaker was cast he said he didn't want it to be done for a gimmick which is the easiest way for it to fail.
|
|
|
Post by barnabaslives on Dec 13, 2017 4:29:08 GMT
There are people who respond to her and want her. Remember the reaction videos of little girls being excited at her announcement that went viral? These people are who we need most right now, if we want the show to survive. We as a fandom have to be mature enough, wise enough, responsbile enough, to know when it's time to let someone else have their go on the swings. Does that mean you have to like Jodie or watch Series 11? No, but can we stop with the missplaced 'ownership', and stop pretending we're the only ones who ever mattered? Well, I hope we do still matter if we're still watching, regardless of our demographic - but I find this very hard to argue with. Some of those youngsters in the videos were a game-changer for me. It was heartwarming to see kids that I wouldn't think had even heard of The Doctor at that age, so excited about the news - I'd no idea it even mattered to them. It does make a difference to me that it makes a difference to them. Also, somehow the very fact that they're going against 50+ years of proven formula just to give it a try, should maybe balance out some of any worry that if it succeeds, female Doctors might become formula. I'm actully more concerned that kids might not get to keep their female Doctor than I am that Capaldi will be the last male to own the TARDIS. In the event that a person just can't get used to the idea, there's still 50+ years of heroic male inspiration to treasure, and we are already incredibly fortunate that the New Series isn't a reboot, but still part of the very same vast epic story. Meanwhile, w hat if lives might be changed for the better in a way that might not have happened if they'd just stuck to the male Doctor formula? I hope occasionally feeling protective about the show doesn't turn out to be a way of 'owning' it, as I do think of the series as something rather rare and precious. (It is just not easy to get me interested in TV shows these days, which I think speaks volumes about the quality and novelty of the series). I do like when the New Series manages to match the original series in tone and spirit well enough that it gives a sense of continuity and feels like the same series. I also like when the NS nods to the original series - not so much that if someone doesn't mention K-9 once an episode it isn't Doctor Who, but I very much like the thought of occasional name-dropping of the original series piquing the curiosity of newer viewers. I hope it inspires the amazing discovery that there are more of these Doctors and a whole universe full of stories about them, and if intrigued viewers do end up exploring the series' past, that it will still be enough like Who as they know it to connect with, or for them to connect with their families over it. "'Who's K-9?' Well aren't you the lucky one, I'm so glad you asked, would you like to see him in his own series first, or the classic series? Probably best to start at the beginning, eh?" :-) Other than that, I'm sure I must be too old to be arguing about a "kid's show," or thinking I own the thing - for quite some time now, probably :-) Something else that was a similar head-turner for me was over the shades - I thought the idea was probably as preposterous as sacrilegious ("Oh, no - you wouldn't want anything sonic near your eyes, have you seen what he does to doors with that screwdriver?"), until someone pointed out that kids can dress up like The Doctor, with just a gray hoodie and an old pair of sunglasses. That is marvelously inclusive, and just delightful in the very same way as all that Tom Baker has done to personally ensure that scarves, no matter how oversize they may be, are thought of as welcome Christmas gifts. I think only Old Man Winter himself has done more to make me glad to get a nice long scarf as a gift. :-)
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 15, 2017 18:58:33 GMT
There are people who respond to her and want her. Remember the reaction videos of little girls being excited at her announcement that went viral? These people are who we need most right now, if we want the show to survive. We as a fandom have to be mature enough, wise enough, responsbile enough, to know when it's time to let someone else have their go on the swings. Does that mean you have to like Jodie or watch Series 11? No, but can we stop with the missplaced 'ownership', and stop pretending we're the only ones who ever mattered? Well, I hope we do still matter if we're still watching, regardless of our demographic - but I find this very hard to argue with. Some of those youngsters in the videos were a game-changer for me. It was heartwarming to see kids that I wouldn't think had even heard of The Doctor at that age, so excited about the news - I'd no idea it even mattered to them. It does make a difference to me that it makes a difference to them. Also, somehow the very fact that they're going against 50+ years of proven formula just to give it a try, should maybe balance out some of any worry that if it succeeds, female Doctors might become formula. I'm actully more concerned that kids might not get to keep their female Doctor than I am that Capaldi will be the last male to own the TARDIS. Even if one hates Jodie as an actress, I'd like to think if she can make a few little girls happy, then it can't be all bad.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Dec 19, 2017 12:04:32 GMT
First thing is not to take fans for granted, especially the older ones.
I'm often amazed at fans reactions to something they disagree with. Many fans have called others who didn't want a woman DW, sexist, misogynists and chauvinists. Yet, I don't remember fans being called that when the Master became a woman! Fans simply agreed to disagree, and there were no name calling. I didn't want a female Master, and I said I didn't want a female Master, and no one called me a chauvinist. Yet, because I'm not happy with a female DW, I get abuse, and complained about, banned and blocked on Twitter, FB, Cultbox, Den of Geek, etc. Perhaps, the ones complaining should take a long hard look at themselves?
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 19, 2017 14:36:04 GMT
First thing is not to take fans for granted, especially the older ones. I'm often amazed at fans reactions to something they disagree with. Many fans have called others who didn't want a woman DW, sexist, misogynists and chauvinists. Yet, I don't remember fans being called that when the Master became a woman! Fans simply agreed to disagree, and there were no name calling. Methinks you were not active on social media when 'Dark Water' broadcast. Trust me, there were MANY who were not happy and didn't hold back on very colourful language towards the Beeb, fans and Moffat.
|
|