|
|
Post by christmastrenzalore on Nov 30, 2015 13:39:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by glutamodo on Nov 30, 2015 13:47:11 GMT
okay, that was amusing.!
|
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Nov 30, 2015 13:50:04 GMT
OMG and LOL
So Great!
Regards
mark687 |
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Nov 30, 2015 14:08:56 GMT
lol, OK, amusing... but why?
|
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Nov 30, 2015 14:20:28 GMT
lol, OK, amusing... but why? just for laughs I've thought. Kind of fails if that's your knee-jerk reaction though not that there's anything wrong with that reaction Jason! 
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Nov 30, 2015 14:44:40 GMT
lol, OK, amusing... but why? just for laughs I've thought. Kind of fails if that's your knee-jerk reaction though not that there's anything wrong with that reaction Jason!
Regards
mark687
Following a few links, people are asserting it's confirmation from Jackson that he will direct an episode of Who. |
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Nov 30, 2015 14:49:36 GMT
just for laughs I've thought. Kind of fails if that's your knee-jerk reaction though not that there's anything wrong with that reaction Jason!
Regards
mark687
Following a few links, people are asserting it's confirmation from Jackson that he will direct an episode of Who. Until I see a BBC News Piece confirming that, l think the vid's just a bit of fun.
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris on Nov 30, 2015 15:25:30 GMT
lol, OK, amusing... but why? just for laughs I've thought. Kind of fails if that's your knee-jerk though not that there's anything wrong with that reaction Jason!
Regards
mark687
"For me, one of the most curious things about this piece is its wonderful... afunctionalism." "Yes. I see what you mean. Divorced from its function and seen purely as a piece of art, its structure of line and colour is curiously counterpointed by the redundant vestiges of its function." "And since it has no call to be here, the art lies in the fact that it is here." "Exquisite... Absolutely exquisite." |
|
|
|
Post by mrfuggleboppins on Nov 30, 2015 17:54:52 GMT
Following a few links, people are asserting it's confirmation from Jackson that he will direct an episode of Who. Until I see a BBC News Piece confirming that, l think the vid's just a bit of fun.
Regards
mark687
Question is: is it canon?  |
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Nov 30, 2015 18:36:20 GMT
Until I see a BBC News Piece confirming that, l think the vid's just a bit of fun.
Regards
mark687
Question is: is it canon?
Regards
mark687
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2015 18:53:46 GMT
Wacky, weird and fun... and that's just Peter Jackson! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2015 22:04:45 GMT
Until I see a BBC News Piece confirming that, l think the vid's just a bit of fun.
Regards
mark687
Question is: is it canon? Definitely. Capaldi was fantastic in it, wish he'd camped it up like that a bit more in the main series. |
|
|
|
Post by elgranto on Dec 5, 2015 4:53:53 GMT
I have mixed feelings about this. If I had learned ten years ago that Peter Jackson was going to direct a Who episode, I'd be jumping for joy at the news. But after King Kong, the Lovely Bones, and those - shall we say - 'Blobbit' films, I'm indifferent to his involvement at best. It looks to me like Moffat and Co. are grasping at straws in light of the ratings plunge.
|
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Dec 5, 2015 5:09:18 GMT
Thought The Hobbit films were great, although the battle of 5 armies seemed... not right, but other than that great.
|
|
