|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Dec 10, 2016 21:50:54 GMT
Putting aside Adams' stature, the mad success of City of Death and the mystique of the unfinished Shada, was this actually a good series?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2016 21:58:13 GMT
Yes.
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Dec 10, 2016 22:19:12 GMT
No
David Brierley doesn't have the vocal timing of John Leeson so K9 becomes annoying. Lalla Ward delivers an odd performance of being both bored to tears and OTT at the same time. Adams Humour which is practically flawless in City feels forced elsewhere,
"Teach yourself Tibetan" and "Oh my Legs..." I'm looking at you.
Regards
mark687
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2016 22:30:36 GMT
Hmmm... for me Season 17 was a mixed bag. The Dalek story was very weak; Destiny of the Daleks is one of the worst Dalek stories ever, I found it very uninspiring. (Davros should have stayed buried on Skaro... IMO.) City of Death was the highlight of this season and as most people acknowledge, is a brilliant piece of TV and a classic Doctor Who story. That was followed by two solid enough stories (Pit and Eden) which were good 4th Doctor and Romana outings, but nothing that special. However, the Horns of Nimon was terrible I thought! So the season started and ended poorly enough.
(I ignore Shada as it wasn't finished. So the BF audio version is my definitive version of that story.)
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Dec 10, 2016 23:21:08 GMT
Nightmare of Eden has a brilliantly imaginative and well written script. Let down by the Mandrels and some poor acting.
|
|
|
Post by omega on Dec 10, 2016 23:37:12 GMT
Pit was Lalla Ward's first recorded story as Romana so she's still trying to find her feet. There's some interesting stuff but everyone remembers Tom getting up close and personal with Erotic, er, Erato.
Horns of Nimon you can tell Tom isn't putting much effort in, as Romana goes off to follow the plot instead of the Doctor! If you like ham however Soldeed could feed a third world country with the scenery he's chewing to bits. It's amazing there's any set left but that's end of season lack of budget for you. If you haven't seen it, YouTube search "How Many Nimon Have You Seen Today?".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2016 0:03:11 GMT
Pit was Lalla Ward's first recorded story as Romana so she's still trying to find her feet. There's some interesting stuff but everyone remembers Tom getting up close and personal with Erotic, er, Erato. Horns of Nimon you can tell Tom isn't putting much effort in, as Romana goes off to follow the plot instead of the Doctor! If you like ham however Soldeed could feed a third world country with the scenery he's chewing to bits. It's amazing there's any set left but that's end of season lack of budget for you. If you haven't seen it, YouTube search "How Many Nimon Have You Seen Today?". Graham Crowden's acting, for me, is the purest joy of that story. It's a rather dull Who-by-numbers effort and Soldeed just livens it up massively. Like Joseph Furst an The Kandyman, fandom has not been too kind to Crowden but, again like Furst and KM he's well suited for the story he's in when not viewed in isoltated out of context clips . I've never thought he's acting badly but that he's pitching a performance exactly where he thinks he should given the material. As you say, Tom wasn't interested in this story so aside from being an average script on paper the lead actor was effectively working a go-slow strike. From what I've read, Tom was at his most difficult during filming so Lalla Ward effectively becomes the heroic lead and Crowden plays off her understated performance (I'm being kind to Lalla) and he delivers the more out-there elements that give the story a bit of life. He absolutely chews the scenery...but it's seldom been so fun to watch a guest star do just that. What would be worth talking about here otherwise? There's a novelty for UK peeps to see Janet Ellis from Blue Peter and Jigsaw as Teka but not much else. Crowden was a terrific actor who made sensational work before and after this series - and anyone who hasn't seen A Most Peculiar Practice with him, Peter Davison and David Troughton please stop what you're doing and seek it out. I actually think there's a lot more to Season 17 than a lot of the stories reputations suggest, City Of Death aside which is obviously a fan-fave. As Paul says Nightmare Of Eden doesn't get nearly as much credit as it should for it's ideas and concept and I have to disagree with Mark - the "Teach Yourself Tibetan" joke is one of my favourite on the show ever. It's entirely in keeping with the absurdity of the Doctor's pocket's having whatever he needs that week and it's taking that joke to the Nth degree. The set up is funny, the pay off is hilarious. I know Bob Baker has credit for the story but that gag has to be Douglas Adams - it's something that could so easily be in Hitchhiker's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2016 2:10:44 GMT
For me personally, I think it felt a little bit clunky and unfinished after all sleek, smooth and altogether rather polished presentation of Season 16's Key to Time umbrella arc. City of Death is a marvellous story worthy of the price of admission alone, but the rest of the season feels almost like it's walking in its shadow. Despite the energy that the new Four/Romana dynamic brings to things, there's a sense of the programme being rather exhausted by its back to basics approach. To my mind, Gareth Roberts's excellent trilogy ( The Romance of Crime, The English Way of Death and The Well-Mannered War, respectively) feels more like what that 1979 season should have been. Shada's history was actually a mixed blessing really as I think it was one of the few stand-out stories of that year. The adaptation with Paul McGann really does justice to it in a way that I don't think the programme at the time really could have. Nightmare of Eden has a brilliantly imaginative and well written script. Let down by the Mandrels and some poor acting. It's definitely a story that was let down by its tumultuous production. It's the Warriors of the Deep method where you hypothetically take another director, assign them to the story in question and think whether or not it's a story problem. In this case, I think Nightmare of Eden would have been regarded as a fun romp had director Christopher Barry been at the helm rather than Alan Bromly.
|
|
shutupbanks
Castellan
There’s a horror movie called Alien? That’s really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you.
Likes: 5,677
|
Post by shutupbanks on Dec 11, 2016 2:21:30 GMT
I want to love it all because it does what the Williams era does so well: take allusions to classical literature, art and mythology and riff off that (providing the BBC has done a similar story in the past so they can use the props and costumes to keep the costs down), it's filled with humour, it has a great TARDIS Team but it has the old problem of show quality careering up and down the street all along the season.
There is one bona fide classic in it (City Of Death), a couple of good stories let down by poor execution (Nightmare Of Eden, Creature From The Pit), a half-decent story let down by very poor execution (Horns Of Nimon), a very average story that looks mostly pretty good (Destiny Of The Daleks) and one story that has been so overloaded with series mythology and retellings that it has too much baggage associated with it to make a really objective judgement about it (Shada). So overall, it's an average season with some spectacular highlights weighted down with liabilities (IMNSHO).
I will counter with another question: in City Of Death when the Doctor, Romana and Duggan are making their way across the barren surface of the Earth to stop Scaroth's spaceship, is it the first occasion that they use the "extended TARDIS forcefield/ atmosphere" that the modern show is so fond of?
|
|
|
Post by omega on Dec 11, 2016 2:34:53 GMT
If Horns of Nimon looked tired, imagine how Shada, the intended finale, would have looked. It's no surprise the production team tried to compensate for this by doing location filming at Cambridge, which would have offset some of the need to build new sets.
I believe that most of the nostalgia for season 17 is actually nostalgia for City of Death, which is one of the stories always held up as the best of Doctor Who ever.
|
|
|
Post by redsharkJason on Dec 11, 2016 4:00:40 GMT
the mystique of the unfinished Shada That's how I perceive Shada. The finished scenes from episode 2 where Tom Baker is on the bicycle are PURE MAGIC. The Cambridge student street singer with the beard always reminds me of Adric! I'm sure it's him, but it's not.
|
|
|
Post by agentten on Dec 11, 2016 4:46:18 GMT
I'm extremely fond of this era of the show so I admit to any bias that might entail, however I think season 17 is somewhat underrated. There are flaws, as others on this thread have pointed out already, but there are also dizzying heights. It's hard to deny that this era had a special magic to it. Even in weaker episodes, there is a charm that has always drawn me to them and I've rewatched this era probably the most of all classic Who.
One thing I hoped for when the classic series was arriving on DVD was for an optional soundtrack on the stories in which David Brierley played K-9 that would replace K-9's lines with lines redubbed by John Leeson. K-9's recast really grates on me. I don't by any means want to banish the David Brierley vocals, but it would be lovely to have a second version on the discs with John Leeson's voice, similar to how there are multiple versions of various stories with added special effects.
|
|
|
Post by icecreamdf on Dec 11, 2016 5:40:20 GMT
Season 17 wasn't that good. City of Death was, of course, amazing, and the novelisation of Shada is very good, but none of the rest of the stories were anything special. None of them were awful, but none were particularly memorable. Romana II is one of my favorite companions though.
|
|
|
Post by TimPendragon on Dec 11, 2016 22:44:11 GMT
It certainly never did much for me, but then I seem to be one of the few people who isn't a fan of Romana II...
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Dec 11, 2016 22:57:02 GMT
It certainly never did much for me, but then I seem to be one of the few people who isn't a fan of Romana II... YANA
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by mrperson on Dec 12, 2016 23:20:05 GMT
Not as good as prior Tom ones, but still better than most TV (maybe that's just bias talking).
|
|
|
Post by mrperson on Dec 12, 2016 23:21:16 GMT
Season 17 wasn't that good. City of Death was, of course, amazing, and the novelisation of Shada is very good, but none of the rest of the stories were anything special. None of them were awful, but none were particularly memorable. Romana II is one of my favorite companions though. Not memobrable? You do not remember The Giant Green Dong?
|
|
|
Post by icecreamdf on Dec 12, 2016 23:25:26 GMT
Not really. Apart from City of Death and Destiny of the Daleks, I don't think I've seen any of that season since I was a kid. Maybe I'll change my mind next time I rewatch some episodes from that season.
|
|
|
Post by kalendorf on Dec 13, 2016 0:33:06 GMT
Destiny of the Daleks was good for its first half, then pretty much falls apart. City of Death is a masterpiece, no doubt. Creature from the Pit was rather a waste that the show would be no poorer without. A damn shame because it's one of the more professional productions this season, but the story has little of merit. Nightmare of Eden had potential but it's an out of control mess that makes me feel kinda queasy, and Tom Baker does get rather insufferable here. Horns of Nimon I think is far better than its reputation. The problem is the previous two stories conspire to make it seem a lot more samey, indistinct and low on inspiration.
I think even the season's worst moments are nowhere near the lows of the coming JNT era, or indeed some of RTD's. It was a far cry from the Hinchcliffe golden age, but I still think of it as representing Doctor Who 'before the fall'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2016 7:24:01 GMT
It depends on your perspective. I was a young kid and I absolutely loved it. If I was only discovering it now I probably wouldn't be impressed.
|
|