|
Post by eldersensorite on Oct 17, 2016 11:49:37 GMT
Well, I can't speak for other people, but I suppose because we haven't left so a lot of people haven't seen the extent of the lies (especially since 1) the brexit department refuse to give any specifics and 2) we haven't actually left yet), or perhaps they don't care about the specifics as long as we don't have to follow EU laws or accept freedom of movement, or that people who do want to hold the leave campaign to account are brushed off as "bremoaners" who hate democracy. Sure, there were lies on the remain side - both sides had a "project fear". Of course I'm biased, but I would say that some remainer's economic concerns have been coming true (and are likely to only become worse once we actually leave) - the value of the pound plummeting, companies being wary of investing (or even planning to move to be based somewhere else) and less than encouraging comments regarding trade deals from other countries. we're getting off topic Yeah, I have no desire to discuss this further. Sorry about helping to hijack the thread, just couldn't resist a good ol' Brexit debate.
|
|
|
Post by acousticwolf on Oct 17, 2016 11:53:00 GMT
***** Moderation ***** All off-topic posts regarding Brexit have been moved to this thread. Please keep on topic. Thanks ***** End Moderation ***** Tony
|
|
|
Post by eldersensorite on Oct 17, 2016 11:59:09 GMT
RETURN TO PELADON The Ruling class are spreading rumours that the Galactic Federation is corrupt. The Miners have been told that aliens will be brought in to do their work. The price of ore is going up, but wages are going down. The King/Queen is powerless. A revolt starts. But, there are aliens behind it, and the Doctor sets out to find them out, and stop them! I don't know... it's kinda amusing to think about but I don't think trying to cram such a complex issue into 45 minutes would make a good episode.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 12:11:49 GMT
***** Moderation ***** All off-topic posts regarding Brexit have been moved to this thread. Please keep on topic. Thanks ***** End Moderation ***** Tony Just briefly. I personally wouldn't mind if the posts were to be permanently deleted, as out of context they don't make much sense...
|
|
|
Post by acousticwolf on Oct 17, 2016 12:14:25 GMT
***** Moderation ***** All off-topic posts regarding Brexit have been moved to this thread. Please keep on topic. Thanks ***** End Moderation ***** Tony Just briefly. I personally wouldn't mind if the posts were to be permanently deleted, as out of context they don't make much sense... Possibly not, but moved rather than deleted in case anybody wants to continue the discussion. Cheers Tony
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Oct 17, 2016 13:00:08 GMT
RETURN TO PELADON The Ruling class are spreading rumours that the Galactic Federation is corrupt. The Miners have been told that aliens will be brought in to do their work. The price of ore is going up, but wages are going down. The King/Queen is powerless. A revolt starts. But, there are aliens behind it, and the Doctor sets out to find them out, and stop them! I don't know... it's kinda amusing to think about but I don't think trying to cram such a complex issue into 45 minutes would make a good episode. Two parter!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 13:55:49 GMT
I don't know... it's kinda amusing to think about but I don't think trying to cram such a complex issue into 45 minutes would make a good episode. Two parter! Yeah. The most bias Doctor Who of all time! No, that's just ruining the show even more. The show needs rejuvination. That doesn't mean add tons of left wing political views into it in an unbias way, turns Doctor Who into the modern reincarnation of The Birth Of A Nation, some people would reckon.
|
|
|
Post by nucleusofswarm on Oct 17, 2016 14:55:33 GMT
Writing for radio and then tv is a natural progression for writers. It's arguably a lot better for your writing too because you're not relying on visuals to exclusively prop up your story. Take a story like In Memory Alone, one of the BBV Stranger stories from the early nineties that Nick Briggs wrote. It has four characters in total, operating in a single isolated location with a very tightly written plot that uses the bare bones atmosphere of the whole thing to its advantage. It's a story that could easily have been done through radio, but it makes a very nice bit of video in its own right. Not gonna derail this thread again, but just quickly wanted to address this 'why can't BF writers do NuWho' bit (these echo things that Nick and John Morris have said in the past on interviews, podcasts and other bits and bobs): 1) It's not about progression (though dalek is not wrong in pointing out the difference in formatting and disciplines), but experience. Most of BF's staff are novelists, comic writers or non fiction authors, with little to no TV experience. Production companies and broadcasters won't consider non screenwriters for projects most times without a track record of some sort. And then there´s the five tons of legal red tape involving solicited submissions and agents, but that would take all day and, again, keeping this brief. 2) Competition: compare the two or three dozen BF regulars that we all want to see on the show versus the thousands of UK TV writers who all want to write for Who and have likely pitched for it multiple times. As a showrunner and script editor with superiors and executives to answer to, are you more likely to gamble on novices in this particular field, or go with someone experienced, who can be trusted to meet a deadline and not need potentially time consuming handholding (and before you say it, no, this is not about who is more talented, but again, experience and dependability)? 3) Schedules: it's no secret that BF make their stuff months before they are even announced, meaning they have to contract writers for however many stories/series they need, which affects how much spare time they have and when they are free (in addition to sometimes doubling up as actors, script editors, directors and producers, as well as outside projects). Same goes for the TV series: Series 10 is nearly all in the can and I imagine Series 11 has most of, if not all, of its staff and stories locked down, so even if they wanted to, Dorney or Morris or Magrs or Smith or whoever you'd want may or would not be able to contribute at this point.
|
|
|
Post by dalekbuster523finish on Oct 17, 2016 21:29:15 GMT
Yeah. The most bias Doctor Who of all time! No, that's just ruining the show even more. The show needs rejuvination. That doesn't mean add tons of left wing political views into it in an unbias way, turns Doctor Who into the modern reincarnation of The Birth Of A Nation, some people would reckon. The BBC would be in a lot of trouble if they made an episode of Doctor Who politically biased, so you've no reason to worry. They're already being accused of showing Anti-Trump bias.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 21:32:33 GMT
Yeah. The most bias Doctor Who of all time! No, that's just ruining the show even more. The show needs rejuvination. That doesn't mean add tons of left wing political views into it in an unbias way, turns Doctor Who into the modern reincarnation of The Birth Of A Nation, some people would reckon. The BBC would be in a lot of trouble if they made an episode of Doctor Who politically biased, so you've no reason to worry. They're already being accused of showing Anti-Trump bias. On the news, yeah. On TV, I dunno. The BBC are meant to educate people, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Oct 17, 2016 21:45:09 GMT
Yeah. The most bias Doctor Who of all time! No, that's just ruining the show even more. The show needs rejuvination. That doesn't mean add tons of left wing political views into it in an unbias way, turns Doctor Who into the modern reincarnation of The Birth Of A Nation, some people would reckon. How does it make him bias? Have you seen The Silurians, Curse of Peladon, Monster of Peladon, or even the two recent Zygon stories?
|
|
|
Post by dalekbuster523finish on Oct 17, 2016 21:53:52 GMT
The BBC would be in a lot of trouble if they made an episode of Doctor Who politically biased, so you've no reason to worry. They're already being accused of showing Anti-Trump bias. On the news, yeah. On TV, I dunno. The BBC are meant to educate people, anyway. I think it would be fine so long as it was subtle but I can't imagine they'd be allowed to have the Doctor's opinion be biased towards the left or right wing. He always tends to have a neutral approach to politics (Kill The Moon being a good example) unless he's trying to make a pacifistic statement (Doctor Who and the Silurians).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 21:56:15 GMT
Yeah. The most bias Doctor Who of all time! No, that's just ruining the show even more. The show needs rejuvination. That doesn't mean add tons of left wing political views into it in an unbias way, turns Doctor Who into the modern reincarnation of The Birth Of A Nation, some people would reckon. How does it make him bias? Have you seen The Silurians, Curse of Peladon, Monster of Peladon, or even the two recent Zygon stories? Silurians, Curse of Peladon and Monster of Peladon can all be let alone because they weren't about major things. Zygon stories were not good in my opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 21:57:51 GMT
On the news, yeah. On TV, I dunno. The BBC are meant to educate people, anyway. I think it would be fine so long as it was subtle but I can't imagine they'd be allowed to have the Doctor's opinion be biased towards the left or right wing. He always tends to have a neutral approach to politics (Kill The Moon being a good example) unless he's trying to make a pacifistic statement (Doctor Who and the Silurians). I rate it being subtle. I like the Doctor being neutral because, in modern times, the Doctor being a figurehead doesn't work. Subtlety is key when doing Brexit. That was one of my key problems with Zygon two-parter.
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Oct 17, 2016 22:29:00 GMT
How does it make him bias? Have you seen The Silurians, Curse of Peladon, Monster of Peladon, or even the two recent Zygon stories? Silurians, Curse of Peladon and Monster of Peladon can all be let alone because they weren't about major things. Zygon stories were not good in my opinion. Silurians dealt with immigration. Curse and Monster dealt with the Common Market aka EU.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2016 1:59:17 GMT
I think it would be fine so long as it was subtle but I can't imagine they'd be allowed to have the Doctor's opinion be biased towards the left or right wing. He always tends to have a neutral approach to politics (Kill The Moon being a good example) unless he's trying to make a pacifistic statement (Doctor Who and the Silurians). I rate it being subtle. I like the Doctor being neutral because, in modern times, the Doctor being a figurehead doesn't work. Subtlety is key when doing Brexit. That was one of my key problems with Zygon two-parter. I had the same here, Doctor Who is usually a lot better with its political commentary. Take The God Complex for example, where the Muslim character Rita says -- "Don't be afraid." That's a beautiful bit of subtext, it almost flies right past you if you're not paying attention. Ironically, The Zygon Invasion also feels really black-and-white despite its subject matter too. Drawing parallels to Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons really didn't do the story any favours either because that show dealt with the infiltrator concept a lot more harshly. We kill your friends, your family, the ones you trust and respect, we replace them with our own people and use them to hurt you. Badly. We never got to know any of the Zygons outside of Oswald, so these people being ousted by their own kind as defectors and traitors are left with no voice. And it's not as if there wasn't any opportunity for exploring some of the greyer aspects of terrorism and infiltration like having a Zygon character who is press-ganged into it for fear of his brood, a UNIT missile base shoot down their own plane, a human media character trying to ramp up people's paranoia, the Doctor going to help the terrorists and UNIT coming down on him for trying to save the lives of enemy combatants, etc. There's a lot that could've been done if only they hadn't pulled their punches. You don't want to be subtle about it? Okay, that could work to your favour. You want to make it a horribly grey situation? Show us how horribly grey it can get. If there's one thing I know children hate, it's being talked down to.
|
|
|
Post by icecreamdf on Oct 18, 2016 3:33:29 GMT
Silurians, Curse of Peladon and Monster of Peladon can all be let alone because they weren't about major things. Zygon stories were not good in my opinion. Silurians dealt with immigration. Curse and Monster dealt with the Common Market aka EU. Yeah, like most good sci-fi, Doctor Who has dealt with political issues on many occassions. And, at least in the Classic Series, the writers didn't really make a secret of the fact that they were left leaning. According to last month's DWM, Moffat believes that the Doctor is "entirely oppossed to Donald Trump as president, because he believes in intelligence and kindness." I don't think that the show would ever literally have the Doctor say that Brexit was a bad idea, but I wouldn't be shocked if they said it was a bad idea using an incredibly transparent metaphor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2016 7:53:34 GMT
Silurians, Curse of Peladon and Monster of Peladon can all be let alone because they weren't about major things. Zygon stories were not good in my opinion. Silurians dealt with immigration. Curse and Monster dealt with the Common Market aka EU. Fair enough. But I'd rate that Silurians did it in a way so that you could still disagree with the Doctor. Also, the Peladon tales deviate from the actual politics a ton, (yeah, murder mystery and an invasion) so I kind of let them off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2016 7:54:43 GMT
I rate it being subtle. I like the Doctor being neutral because, in modern times, the Doctor being a figurehead doesn't work. Subtlety is key when doing Brexit. That was one of my key problems with Zygon two-parter. I had the same here, Doctor Who is usually a lot better with its political commentary. Take The God Complex for example, where the Muslim character Rita says -- "Don't be afraid." That's a beautiful bit of subtext, it almost flies right past you if you're not paying attention. Ironically, The Zygon Invasion also feels really black-and-white despite its subject matter too. Drawing parallels to Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons really didn't do the story any favours either because that show dealt with the infiltrator concept a lot more harshly. We kill your friends, your family, the ones you trust and respect, we replace them with our own people and use them to hurt you. Badly. We never got to know any of the Zygons outside of Oswald, so these people being ousted by their own kind as defectors and traitors are left with no voice. And it's not as if there wasn't any opportunity for exploring some of the greyer aspects of terrorism and infiltration like having a Zygon character who is press-ganged into it for fear of his brood, a UNIT missile base shoot down their own plane, a human media character trying to ramp up people's paranoia, the Doctor going to help the terrorists and UNIT coming down on him for trying to save the lives of enemy combatants, etc. There's a lot that could've been done if only they hadn't pulled their punches. You don't want to be subtle about it? Okay, that could work to your favour. You want to make it a horribly grey situation? Show us how horribly grey it can get. If there's one thing I know children hate, it's being talked down to. My problem is that is that the Doctor's role in the story is just Steven Moffat's and Peter Harness's voice piece.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2016 7:58:13 GMT
Silurians dealt with immigration. Curse and Monster dealt with the Common Market aka EU. Yeah, like most good sci-fi, Doctor Who has dealt with political issues on many occassions. And, at least in the Classic Series, the writers didn't really make a secret of the fact that they were left leaning. According to last month's DWM, Moffat believes that the Doctor is "entirely oppossed to Donald Trump as president, because he believes in intelligence and kindness." I don't think that the show would ever literally have the Doctor say that Brexit was a bad idea, but I wouldn't be shocked if they said it was a bad idea using an incredibly transparent metaphor. I'm just thinking. In the Classic Series and RTD's era, they always edited events to make them vaguely different. Or just used caricatures. I mean, look at The Happiness Patrol and Aliens Of London/World War Three. Also, the political elements in the Pertwee era, I often think you could have the choice of bidding either side. Take Silurians, where you could theoretically either agree with the Doctor or the Brigadier. After all, they are both portrayed as the good guys, except the end.
|
|