|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Mar 12, 2017 14:18:56 GMT
Which happens in every Doctor Who episode, and every single tv drama and movie ! So bad writing existing elsewhere justifies all the bad writing in Warriors' script? Yeah, let's have no standards at all. All I did was highlight (literally) something you pointed out, that happens in every tv drama and movie. How often was James Bond, or Roj Blake captured?
|
|
|
Post by kalendorf on Mar 12, 2017 14:25:23 GMT
So bad writing existing elsewhere justifies all the bad writing in Warriors' script? Yeah, let's have no standards at all. All I did was highlight (literally) something you pointed out, that happens in every tv drama and movie. How often was James Bond, or Roj Blake captured? Quite often, but they didn't then soapbox about how the fact they were captured alive proves a moral case of how the bad guys are actually merciful and so everyone should surrender to them and expect the same treatment, and if they don't then they're warmongering bigots. Minor contrivances like that can be forgiven if the story at least tries to work cleverly with or around them, or at least goes some way to drawing the audience's good will, or rather making it feel that the hero's survival has been earned in general. Warriors of the Deep does completely the opposite of that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2017 15:04:46 GMT
The story is fine, but there are too many bad things about it - lighting, acting, Myrka... But the actual writing is pretty good, it's the execution that's not so well done. It's the same with Paradise Towers. The writing there was great, it's just that spray tan, cringeworthy future slang, a slender actor playing the character Pex and comedy legs hanging out of shiny white cleaning robots. Regarding Paradise Towers - and all of Series 24, actually - I thought JNT did a pretty clever thing. There was still the shadow of Michael Grade's words hanging over Doctor Who, that it was too violent, scary and not attracting the children (words that have since been pretty much proven nonsensical, uttered by a man who disliked the show, wanted it gone, and then had to justify his stance). Like Graham Williams before him, the producer commissioned some pretty serious stories and gave them very lightweight, child-friendly production values to allow them to be broadcast without adverse comment (he hoped). Paradise Towers could have been genuinely frightening - terrifying even - if executed differently, Delta and the Bannermen could have been a lot stronger and more heartfelt, and Dragonfire would probably have ended up pretty much the same. Dragonfire's one shocking moment, that of Kane melting, attracted many complaints. If the rest of the series had been that brave (or foolhardy), making Doctor Who frightening again at such a 'sensitive' time, it might not have survived even as long as it did. That's my long-held viewpoint anyway, and I'm a fan of Series 24.
|
|
|
Post by barnabaslives on Mar 12, 2017 18:28:21 GMT
Regarding Paradise Towers - and all of Series 24, actually - I thought JNT did a pretty clever thing. There was still the shadow of Michael Grade's words hanging over Doctor Who, that it was too violent, scary and not attracting the children (words that have since been pretty much proven nonsensical, uttered by a man who disliked the show, wanted it gone, and then had to justify his stance). Like Graham Williams before him, the producer commissioned some pretty serious stories and gave them very lightweight, child-friendly production values to allow them to be broadcast without adverse comment (he hoped). Thanks for that, that's actually news to me. I'm not sure how much of that news could have found its way to me in the US when those aired, and I don't remember seeing it before when trying to figure out what the hell they were thinking back there. It's good to consider now, because I think the Seventh Doctor era is finally starting to make more sense to me (especially the parts I like to complain about) - or at least as much as it's going to, since Grade's comments don't make much sense in the first place. I don't suppose I should try to wrestle with his stale points, but they're pretty remarkable - as if there were anything very child-friendly about Dalek extermination other than that one could temper the violence of it by dwelling on a certain Dalek resemblance to dustbins or spice shakers. Likewise, I did find some of Sylvester's comments about The Happiness Patrol recently or I'd otherwise never have guessed that the social commentary of that story might have been aimed at anyone in particular. I may still cringe while watching it, but at least I think I'm beginning to get some understanding of why the story doesn't go the way I'd want it to, and that maybe I should be glad it doesn't. Curiously, I think that's next up in strict order on my viewing list - I may still skip it as planned, but at least I'm having second thoughts about skipping it, which is for me a whole new level of appreciation for it. :-) I'll tell you what I think has really helped change my opinion of Paradise Towers somewhat, is BF's brilliant Spaceport Fear audio, where a lot of what I don't like about Paradise Towers is elevated to a delightful artform. Suddenly I wanted to nominate Spaceport Fear for the "Bin Liner Award" and for the first time I meant that expression in a good way. :-)
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Mar 12, 2017 21:25:13 GMT
Wobbly sets - the ONLY story that really stands out as 'wobbly set' territory for me is 'The Invisible Enemy' with four or five conspicous wobbles, which I noticed because normally the sets DON'T wobble. (And that season the budget problems were severe, with inflation around 20% destroying their budget as they worked.) Maybe you should look back on Invasion of the Dinosaurs - when the Doctor's walking round the corridors and the bulkheads are coming down, I don't think there is a single surface on set that isn't shifting violently in some direction You are perfectly right, I know exactly the scenes you mean and those were some of the painted backcloth walls I was referring to in the rest of the post! (In 'The Invisible Enemy', actual solid scenery moves - now that IS embarrassing!) It's the wobbly T-Rex that's the real problem in Invasion of the Dinosaurs... However, I was the target audience when it was originally broadcast and all I saw was my Doctor battling dinosaurs - and it was brilliant from start to finish! They didn't know that legions of older fans would be watching over and over again on VHS then DVD then streaming to spot every flaw as we do. Bonus features!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2017 1:13:32 GMT
Well the British people have frequently in large numbers protested America's pushings for war, and there's been huge protests here recently over Trump's refugee ban, even though I don't really see that as any of our business, and even if it were, why was no-one here protesting the Saudi Monarchy and the other rich Gulf states, for doing the same thing? The English-speaking world reacts to the English-speaking world, I feel. Cultural differences are such that people probably feel more comfortable trying to mend their own backyard rather than interfere in someone else's, even if they do have the same problems. The media is also a factor when judging these sorts of things, here in Australia there was a curious blackout when the protests were going on and we found out a couple days afterward that they'd been going on. Maybe but the problem is this gets grossly, and brazenly overshadowed by the worse blunder of Turlough actively forcing them to reopen the bulkhead to save two people at the cost of endangering everyone else. And this for me is why the story can't afford to have the Doctor fail here. Turlough's decision does cost lives that might've been saved otherwise, but that could be redressed dramatically if we saw that in saving the Doctor, he's saved the base's single hope, and ultimately it's proven that things would've turned out far worse if Turlough hadn't. Instead by the end, almost no-one is saved by the Doctor, and humanity is only saved by someone giving the Doctor a boot up the backside to use the gas. The day is saved in spite of, not because of the Doctor's insistence. I can mostly go with this, except that he must know he could've dispatched the Myrka and ended its murderous rampage far sooner if he'd used Hexacromite gas upon it there and then. Instead he goes to the cumbersome trouble of fixing the ultra light converter to achieve the same end much later. And again I can only put this down to him deliberately hiding the means to end this. Honestly, I thought most of the misanthropy stemmed from a growing sense of frustration in the Doctor that there is only a violent solution to this particular crisis. He desperately wants a solution that's been denied to him for so long and unfortunately, I think he's so blinded by his characteristic idealism here that he's trying to force an outcome he probably knows deep down isn't going to happen. Preston's attempt to shoot down the Sea Devil leader kind of proves my point about how grey the entire situation is and I think it's her death that compels him to go through with using the hexochromite gas. Given that it liquefies the respiratory systems of reptilian life, that strikes me as basically using the equivalent of Agent Orange on a human detachment. Not something to be taken lightly. Also, if there'd been a puncture in seabase for any reason, the gas would have likely contaminated the surrounding marine life including what could potentially be the Silurian city out there, people who may have no idea what's going on. The problem is, the Doctor is only alive to meet Ictar by means of plot convenience that the Sea Devil that caught him didn't just shoot him on the spot. When he has that kind of guaranteed plot immunity, it feels tacky for him to demand the humans show the same faith and hope not to be killed on the spot. He's also dressed as a reactor technician and given that the Silurians have just captured that room, I suspect they'd want a complicit human to monitor the situation down there once the fighting has died down. Always good to have a spare. I return to my "lashing out because of frustration" argument, he's under a lot of pressure here. You can see it when he convinces Vorshak to go along with the Silurians, he's searching for a reasonable solution to avoid another senseless waste of life. I'd say that's the biggest missed opportunity. When Ictar first revives the sleeping Sea Devils, an entire discussion could've been had where we see the Sea Devils' culture shock and reluctance at being awoken onto an immediate war footing they were never expecting when they first slept, but are now being told to fight and die against a new species they didn't even know about before. We could've seen dissent in their ranks, and it would've both shown dimension and shades of grey to what were otherwise cipher grunts, and been an opportunity for Ictar to fill them, and casual viewers in on the backstory of the Pertwee serials. Johnny Byrne scripts and I typically don't get on because I find them a bit repetitive, but it would have been fascinating to see what the double-length original scripts would have looked like. You'd have needed a particularly clever director to ensure that there wasn't too much budget being thrown at the wall, but if you redressed the sets and used different lighting for the bunker and Seabase I think you could have gotten away with it. It might have worked a great deal better in some respects had the story been tightened up to six parts instead of the requisite four we see here. The Keeper of Traken was nice, but Arc of Infinity didn't particularly inspire confidence and the crushingly slow pace of Space: 1999 is something I don't really want to repeat. I'm not that bothered by the potential misanthropy of it all myself, it's a pretty standard approach for darker science fiction. Humans can be pretty nasty creatures. Phew. This has been a fascinating discussion. Largely irreconcilable, but fascinating nonetheless.
|
|
aztec
Chancellery Guard
Likes: 2,849
|
Post by aztec on Mar 22, 2017 17:34:22 GMT
The Web Planet is arguably Classic Who at its best and worse...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 18:27:52 GMT
The Web Planet is arguably Classic Who at its best and worse... I'd agree with 50% of that statement ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 1:01:04 GMT
The Web Planet is arguably Classic Who at its best and worse... There's a really interesting story there buried beneath the endless swathes of padding. The Doctor is recruited involuntarily as a codebreaker, Barbara is thrown in with a resistance group in a labour camp, Ian meets a species descended from the original Menoptera who have adjusted to their wingless existence, etc. There was a good fan edit a couple years back that pared it all down to something like seventy or eighty minutes and the results are really watchable.
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Mar 23, 2017 15:13:32 GMT
Can I put in a good word for 'The Web Planet' please? I read the novelisation 40 years ago and really enjoyed its alien quality – but the TV story had such a poor reputation that I’d never watched it until last year. My mistake! The style and realisation were far better than I ever imagined, as ‘Doctor Who and the Zarbi’ came to life before my (non-multi-faceted) eyes. I thought it was astonishingly daring, utterly alien and possibly alienating - but unique and I loved it! The Menoptera are a splendid creation – and sometimes, magnificently, they actually fly! (Which I never imagined they would really have done on TV, when I read the novel.) The strange beings, the stylised language and movement, the total, absolute 'alienness' of it all, culminating in the way the Optera speak (almost incredibly) in metaphors. This is beyond daring for a ‘teatime’ show, either mad or brilliant depending on your view. They would never try to do it again quite like this, but apart from one or two production moments (caused by lack of time and money for reshoots) and The Animus in the final episode (where the body does not live up to the excellent voice), I think it works wonderfully. In my opinion, author Bill Strutton, producer Verity Lambert, director Richard Martin and their team created a truly unique classic of early ‘Doctor Who’ and (as Prapillus the wise old Menoptera says of the TARDIS crew) “Their deeds shall be sung in the Temples of Light” – they will be by me anyway!
|
|
|
Post by fingersmash on Mar 23, 2017 19:52:43 GMT
The Web Planet is arguably Classic Who at its best and worse... There's a really interesting story there buried beneath the endless swathes of padding. The Doctor is recruited involuntarily as a codebreaker, Barbara is thrown in with a resistance group in a labour camp, Ian meets a species descended from the original Menoptera who have adjusted to their wingless existence, etc. There was a good fan edit a couple years back that pared it all down to something like seventy or eighty minutes and the results are really watchable. I just found it. Not sure if it'd be against forum rules or not to share but a simple Google search does the job.
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Mar 23, 2017 20:42:07 GMT
The tree from Mark of the Rani.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 21:23:12 GMT
The tree from Mark of the Rani. I take it you mean that tree from Mark of the Rani! I have to take issue with you there. Genuinely, I felt quite soppily happy when Peri was rescued by the former Luke Ward. It's the kind of silly, goofy, strangely touching moment that only Doctor Who can get away with. It's also the kind of extravagance the show needed after its rather solemn 'no joke' policy from its last few years. A bit of fun. Love the tree.
|
|
|
Post by barnabaslives on Mar 25, 2017 10:12:37 GMT
Can I put in a good word for 'The Web Planet' please? Sure. I have a couple of qualms about it but they're really no big deal. In fact, I didn't watch more than 15 minutes of it before saving it for later and not getting back to it yet, so I don't have very much business ripping on an episode I haven't ever seen. I'll probably enjoy it plenty when I get to it. You definitely make it sound like I will!
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Mar 25, 2017 10:51:25 GMT
Can I put in a good word for 'The Web Planet' please? Sure. I have a couple of qualms about it but they're really no big deal. In fact, I didn't watch more than 15 minutes of it before saving it for later and not getting back to it yet, so I don't have very much business ripping on an episode I haven't ever seen. I'll probably enjoy it plenty when I get to it. You definitely make it sound like I will! I'm not a huge fan of Web Planet, I can't remember when I last watched it. It is too long, but a fantastic idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2017 13:00:19 GMT
The tree from Mark of the Rani. I take it you mean that tree from Mark of the Rani! I have to take issue with you there. Genuinely, I felt quite soppily happy when Peri was rescued by the former Luke Ward. It's the kind of silly, goofy, strangely touching moment that only Doctor Who can get away with. It's also the kind of extravagance the show needed after its rather solemn 'no joke' policy from its last few years. A bit of fun. Love the tree. It was a horrible moment when I became humiliated to admit being a Doctor Who fan. It might have been a good idea, bit in execution was so bad it should never have made the final edit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2017 13:04:54 GMT
I take it you mean that tree from Mark of the Rani! I have to take issue with you there. Genuinely, I felt quite soppily happy when Peri was rescued by the former Luke Ward. It's the kind of silly, goofy, strangely touching moment that only Doctor Who can get away with. It's also the kind of extravagance the show needed after its rather solemn 'no joke' policy from its last few years. A bit of fun. Love the tree. It was a horrible moment when I became humiliated to admit being a Doctor Who fan. It might have been a good idea, bit in execution was so bad it should never have made the final edit. I certainly don't think it was that bad. Did you find it more humiliating to watch that the previous series' 'Twin Dilemma' and 'Warriors of the Deep'? The very fact that the (pretty brief) sequence you mention was on film rather than video saved it from looking a lot worse, I think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2017 14:53:39 GMT
It was a horrible moment when I became humiliated to admit being a Doctor Who fan. It might have been a good idea, bit in execution was so bad it should never have made the final edit. I certainly don't think it was that bad. Did you find it more humiliating to watch that the previous series' 'Twin Dilemma' and 'Warriors of the Deep'? The very fact that the (pretty brief) sequence you mention was on film rather than video saved it from looking a lot worse, I think. The only thing that bothered me in Warriors was the myka standing on a jabolite door. Twin Dilemma was the beginning of a slippery slope but that tree killed me off.
|
|
|
Post by paulmorris7777 on Mar 25, 2017 16:39:29 GMT
I certainly don't think it was that bad. Did you find it more humiliating to watch that the previous series' 'Twin Dilemma' and 'Warriors of the Deep'? The very fact that the (pretty brief) sequence you mention was on film rather than video saved it from looking a lot worse, I think. The only thing that bothered me in Warriors was the myka standing on a jabolite door. Twin Dilemma was the beginning of a slippery slope but that tree killed me off. Yeah. I can only defend Classic Who so far!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2017 0:29:27 GMT
It was a horrible moment when I became humiliated to admit being a Doctor Who fan. It might have been a good idea, bit in execution was so bad it should never have made the final edit. I certainly don't think it was that bad. Did you find it more humiliating to watch that the previous series' 'Twin Dilemma' and 'Warriors of the Deep'? The very fact that the (pretty brief) sequence you mention was on film rather than video saved it from looking a lot worse, I think. It's a shame they couldn't afford shooting everything on film because the results are really lovely to look at. What often made something look less than the sum of its parts was the lighting, particularly in the oft criticised 1980s. For every Warriors of the Deep or The Twin Dilemma, there's an Enlightenment or Vengeance on Varos lurking around in the background where everything has a very nice atmospheric mood to it. The Twin Dilemma's a good example actually, the Doctor and Peri wandering around the under-lit conduits of Titan III looks really nice for what are essentially grey, featureless walls and then you get hit with the glittering main room where every lacking facet is on for display rather than hidden away beneath a noir darkness.
|
|