|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 22, 2017 15:21:31 GMT
They're seriously regretting the ID scheme now that Brexit is happening, and whatever about foreign aid the equal marriage act was going to happen with or without Cameron, despite the loons in his party. Why does Brexit mean scrapping the ID scheme is or should now be regretted? (Serious question.) I hadn't heard that it was regretted. It was and remains an illiberal idea. On equal marriage, he was the PM, he chose put it to Parliament against the - 'traditionalists' - in his own party as you say; without Cameron the law would not have been changed. Really? In a period where the talk ranges across deporting EU nationals the regret is simply that there is no centralised ID centre where all those pesky foreigners could be handily separated from "our people". My point re marriage equality is that it was going to happen, it's a necessary step forward in rights for citizens. Sure, Fair play to Cameron for doing that but it was going to happen under whoever because right now is when that social movement is cresting. And this isn't the US so it's an easy win.
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Apr 22, 2017 16:43:44 GMT
Why does Brexit mean scrapping the ID scheme is or should now be regretted? (Serious question.) I hadn't heard that it was regretted. It was and remains an illiberal idea. On equal marriage, he was the PM, he chose put it to Parliament against the - 'traditionalists' - in his own party as you say; without Cameron the law would not have been changed. Really? In a period where the talk ranges across deporting EU nationals the regret is simply that there is no centralised ID centre where all those pesky foreigners could be handily separated from "our people". My point re marriage equality is that it was going to happen, it's a necessary step forward in rights for citizens. Sure, Fair play to Cameron for doing that but it was going to happen under whoever because right now is when that social movement is cresting. And this isn't the US so it's an easy win. OK, but I've not heard any politician express that 'regret' - and that hypothetical scenario underlines why a statist ID scheme was such a bad idea. Extremists may have suggested 'deporting EU nationals' but has any serious politician of any mainstream party? The argument will be over relative rights for E.U. citizens here and British citizens in the E.U. I think the outlook is hopeful for 100% continuation of all current rights, because both sides want it and want it as a priority. But it will still be complex to achieve at a technical level (e.g. should the European Court adjudicate? That's the E.U. suggestion but an obvious non-starter in post-Brexit Britain), one indication of how incredibly complex Brexit is going to be. Personally I was fully in favour of the free movement of E.U. nationals and would be perfectly happy to see that continue as a quid-pro-quo for continued mutual free trade, but then I was also happy to Remain.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 22, 2017 16:54:57 GMT
Really? In a period where the talk ranges across deporting EU nationals the regret is simply that there is no centralised ID centre where all those pesky foreigners could be handily separated from "our people". My point re marriage equality is that it was going to happen, it's a necessary step forward in rights for citizens. Sure, Fair play to Cameron for doing that but it was going to happen under whoever because right now is when that social movement is cresting. And this isn't the US so it's an easy win. OK, but I've not heard any politician express that 'regret' - and that hypothetical scenario underlines why a statist ID scheme was such a bad idea. Extremists may have suggested 'deporting EU nationals' but has any serious politician of any mainstream party? The argument will be over relative rights for E.U. citizens here and British citizens in the E.U. I think the outlook is hopeful for 100% continuation of all current rights, because both sides want it and want it as a priority. But it will still be complex to achieve at a technical level (e.g. should the European Court adjudicate? That's the E.U. suggestion but an obvious non-starter in post-Brexit Britain), one indication of how incredibly complex Brexit is going to be. Personally I was fully in favour of the free movement of E.U. nationals and would be perfectly happy to see that continue as a quid-pro-quo for continued mutual free trade, but then I was also happy to Remain. I think we're mostly on the same page here, and I haven't seen prominent politicians tout the ID scheme like that to be fair, but neither has the government just done the right thing and grandfathered in the security of those already living here legally, and that's an issue. "Well, they haven't etc". Well, call me suspicious but I see the EU doing just that if the government did, and I don't see the government doing it if the the EU does it first, because ...Tories. Honestly, we know that the Tory government hasn't a clue what it's doing about Brexit, it really doesn't, worse is it doesn't actually care, if it did then it would have addressed certain problems properly such as Gibraltar, and more importantly Northern Ireland. Brexit can't realistically be stopped now but with a different government it could be shaped better.
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Apr 22, 2017 17:55:57 GMT
'Doctor Who' fans who follow politics will likely enjoy the typically lighthearted Round Up of the political week on 'This Week', starting at 19:35 into the programme - and this week it's apparently presented by "the Doctor" himself - that must be an incarnation I missed, sure I recognise the hat and scarf though ... This Week - 20/04/2017
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Apr 22, 2017 18:04:54 GMT
Honestly, we know that the Tory government hasn't a clue what it's doing about Brexit, it really doesn't, worse is it doesn't actually care, if it did then it would have addressed certain problems properly such as Gibraltar, and more importantly Northern Ireland. Brexit can't realistically be stopped now but with a different government it could be shaped better. Much as I have no love and little trust in the current government, I don't see how they can be characterised as not caring about Brexit, Gibraltar, NI and much more besides are incredibly hard subjects to get right, if they can be got right at all, sure the government is clueless, but who isn't? Is there any credible person that says they know how to solve all the issues arising from Brexit? Cameron handed the people a shot gun, the people shot off their own right leg, and now May is tasked with fixing the bloody mess, only there are no trained surgeons around, so... yeah. Sure May has an agenda I'm not aligned with, and I don't trust her at all, but in terms of preparation and ability to resolve the many issues, she seems no worst placed than anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by TinDogPodcast on Apr 22, 2017 19:19:01 GMT
I can't believe that jo ports memorial will be delayed...
Oh incase we accedently hear some of her policy's being read out.
I've a hate inside me.... it's like dispare but with teeth
|
|
|
Post by mark687 on Apr 22, 2017 19:27:57 GMT
I can't believe that jo ports memorial will be delayed... Oh incase we accedently hear some of her policy's being read out. I've a hate inside me.... it's like dispare but with teeth That's crazy
Regards
mark687
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 22, 2017 19:29:33 GMT
Honestly, we know that the Tory government hasn't a clue what it's doing about Brexit, it really doesn't, worse is it doesn't actually care, if it did then it would have addressed certain problems properly such as Gibraltar, and more importantly Northern Ireland. Brexit can't realistically be stopped now but with a different government it could be shaped better. Much as I have no love and little trust in the current government, I don't see how they can be characterised as not caring about Brexit, Gibraltar, NI and much more besides are incredibly hard subjects to get right, if they can be got right at all, sure the government is clueless, but who isn't? Is there any credible person that says they know how to solve all the issues arising from Brexit? Cameron handed the people a shot gun, the people shot off their own right leg, and now May is tasked with fixing the bloody mess, only there are no trained surgeons around, so... yeah. Sure May has an agenda I'm not aligned with, and I don't trust her at all, but in terms of preparation and ability to resolve the many issues, she seems no worst placed than anyone else. Oh right, I'll reframe that then. They care about Brexit but only in their own tiny idealogue way, which is based on nothing. I'll step by the idea that leaving was even right or wrong, that's a different argument entirely. I'll take NI for example. Never mind the lunacy that enforcing a 300 plus mile border is, and the UK is lucky in that Ireland is a pleasant neighbour unlike Spain at the moment (and they should have seen THAT coming) but legally every UK citizen born in NI is entitled to an Irish passport and Irish citizenry, and that isn't EU citizenry via membership of the EU, it's a bigger thing that still allows EU citizenship. So is that going to keep on? Can they actually revoke it? What will happen if they keep it? If they don't? Not a single one of these questions has been raised or dealt with by the government. I know for a fact that the Irish government set up an entire internal department to deal with it just after the referendum result was announced, yet they're not in the driving seat because they can't be, and still May's government has no plan. We should blame Cameron because he was an idiot and as you said handed over a loaded shotgun. How do you solve it? Right, Brexit is going ahead so you make damn sure that the Johnson/Gove mentality is removed from your government and you behave like grown ups and you have preliminary talks. The EU refused to have talks? Course they did, and then you talk to them anyway because that's how diplomacy works and that's why we have a Foreign Office and HAD an ambassador to the EU. Because all I see is "We're taking our ball and going home" except it's not your ball. Hi EU, we're respecting the democratic (but still non binding!) wishes of our people and leaving, and we have to trigger the article to do that so can we all sit down and work out how to do that without crippling each other? I'll stop. Otherwise I'll just go on more. Vote. If you vote Tory I will not understand you but whatever you do, vote, especially you 18 to 24 year olds. Apathy in politics in not an answer now, and never has been. Sure, parts of it are dull but so is a large swathe of life, get over yourself and vote.
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Apr 23, 2017 1:20:41 GMT
I'll take NI for example. Never mind the lunacy that enforcing a 300 plus mile border is, and the UK is lucky in that Ireland is a pleasant neighbour unlike Spain at the moment (and they should have seen THAT coming) but legally every UK citizen born in NI is entitled to an Irish passport and Irish citizenry, and that isn't EU citizenry via membership of the EU, it's a bigger thing that still allows EU citizenship. So is that going to keep on? Can they actually revoke it? What will happen if they keep it? If they don't? Not a single one of these questions has been raised or dealt with by the government. I know for a fact that the Irish government set up an entire internal department to deal with it just after the referendum result was announced, yet they're not in the driving seat because they can't be, and still May's government has no plan. We should blame Cameron because he was an idiot and as you said handed over a loaded shotgun. Why would UK citizens with dual nationality with Eire and thereby access to the EU be a problem for the UK Government? And, who gets be an Eire citizen is matter for the Eire government, not the UK government, so no, they can't prevent it, but I'm struggling to imagine why the UK government would want to prevent it. How do you solve it? Right, Brexit is going ahead so you make damn sure that the Johnson/Gove mentality is removed from your government and you behave like grown ups and you have preliminary talks. The EU refused to have talks? Course they did, and then you talk to them anyway because that's how diplomacy works and that's why we have a Foreign Office and HAD an ambassador to the EU. Because all I see is "We're taking our ball and going home" except it's not your ball. Hi EU, we're respecting the democratic (but still non binding!) wishes of our people and leaving, and we have to trigger the article to do that so can we all sit down and work out how to do that without crippling each other? Whilst I would love a different approach, I don't see how any different approach, headed by anyone could "solve" in of itself the issues surrounding Brexit. Helpful perhaps, but solved? We will still be living and dealing with the issues arising from leaving the EU in 20 years time, let alone the 23 months now before it happens.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 23, 2017 1:28:34 GMT
I'll take NI for example. Never mind the lunacy that enforcing a 300 plus mile border is, and the UK is lucky in that Ireland is a pleasant neighbour unlike Spain at the moment (and they should have seen THAT coming) but legally every UK citizen born in NI is entitled to an Irish passport and Irish citizenry, and that isn't EU citizenry via membership of the EU, it's a bigger thing that still allows EU citizenship. So is that going to keep on? Can they actually revoke it? What will happen if they keep it? If they don't? Not a single one of these questions has been raised or dealt with by the government. I know for a fact that the Irish government set up an entire internal department to deal with it just after the referendum result was announced, yet they're not in the driving seat because they can't be, and still May's government has no plan. We should blame Cameron because he was an idiot and as you said handed over a loaded shotgun. Why would UK citizens with dual nationality with Eire and thereby access to the EU be a problem for the UK Government? And, who gets be an Eire citizen is matter for the Eire government, not the UK government, so no, they can't prevent it, but I'm struggling to imagine why the UK government would want to prevent it. How do you solve it? Right, Brexit is going ahead so you make damn sure that the Johnson/Gove mentality is removed from your government and you behave like grown ups and you have preliminary talks. The EU refused to have talks? Course they did, and then you talk to them anyway because that's how diplomacy works and that's why we have a Foreign Office and HAD an ambassador to the EU. Because all I see is "We're taking our ball and going home" except it's not your ball. Hi EU, we're respecting the democratic (but still non binding!) wishes of our people and leaving, and we have to trigger the article to do that so can we all sit down and work out how to do that without crippling each other? Whilst I would love a different approach, I don't see how any different approach, headed by anyone could "solve" in of itself the issues surrounding Brexit. Helpful perhaps, but solved? We will still be living and dealing with the issues arising from leaving the EU in 20 years time, let alone the 23 months now before it happens. Well, when every citizen of one of the four countries of the UK retains the right to be an EU citizen and the others don't then there's a major discrepancy there. And it's all part of the peace process rather than the government of Ireland just granting it to them ad hoc, so THEY can't simply remove it nor would they. It's a loophole where all the angles haven't been thought through because no thought was given to it at all frankly. As for solving? Yeah, you're correct. We're going to have that ball of string to unravel for years to come. Wait until the GREAT ACT OF REPEAL arrives, or whatever Darth May is calling it now.
|
|
|
Post by jasonward on Apr 23, 2017 1:44:49 GMT
]Well, when every citizen of one of the four countries of the UK retains the right to be an EU citizen and the others don't then there's a major discrepancy there. And it's all part of the peace process rather than the government of Ireland just granting it to them ad hoc, so THEY can't simply remove it nor would they. It's a loophole where all the angles haven't been thought through because no thought was given to it at all frankly. The citizenship thing was introduced at the time of the partition, it pre-dates the EU by decades, Eire citizen living in the UK get to vote in all our elections, the only foreign nationals to enjoy such a privilege, and again all down the settlement that was made when Ireland was partitioned. These existed before we were part of the EU, existed whilst we were part of the EU and I'm struggling to understand why they wouldn't continue after we left.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 23, 2017 1:49:19 GMT
]Well, when every citizen of one of the four countries of the UK retains the right to be an EU citizen and the others don't then there's a major discrepancy there. And it's all part of the peace process rather than the government of Ireland just granting it to them ad hoc, so THEY can't simply remove it nor would they. It's a loophole where all the angles haven't been thought through because no thought was given to it at all frankly. The citizenship thing was introduced at the time of the partition, it pre-dates the EU by decades, Eire citizen living in the UK get to vote in all our elections, the only foreign nationals to enjoy such a privilege, and again all down the settlement that was made when Ireland was partitioned. These existed before we were part of the EU, existed whilst we were part of the EU and I'm struggling to understand why they wouldn't continue after we left. Nope. That's not the issue. The right of UK nationals to have EU citizenship despite having left the EU and still not living in it is the issue, and that only dates since about the Good Friday Agreement. I am an Irish citizen living in the UK and I'm fully up on what MY rights are re the UK, it's the other way around that is the thing that wasn't considered.
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Apr 23, 2017 8:43:48 GMT
Why would UK citizens with dual nationality with Eire and thereby access to the EU be a problem for the UK Government? And, who gets be an Eire citizen is matter for the Eire government, not the UK government, so no, they can't prevent it, but I'm struggling to imagine why the UK government would want to prevent it. Whilst I would love a different approach, I don't see how any different approach, headed by anyone could "solve" in of itself the issues surrounding Brexit. Helpful perhaps, but solved? We will still be living and dealing with the issues arising from leaving the EU in 20 years time, let alone the 23 months now before it happens. Well, when every citizen of one of the four countries of the UK retains the right to be an EU citizen and the others don't then there's a major discrepancy there. And it's all part of the peace process rather than the government of Ireland just granting it to them ad hoc, so THEY can't simply remove it nor would they. It's a loophole where all the angles haven't been thought through because no thought was given to it at all frankly. As for solving? Yeah, you're correct. We're going to have that ball of string to unravel for years to come. Wait until the GREAT ACT OF REPEAL arrives, or whatever Darth May is calling it now. Just to reassure you, the Great Repeal Bill she's announced doesn't actually repeal anything. Unless it changes radically from what she's announced all it will do is transfer all EU law into UK law, without repealing any of it. Calling it the Great Repeal Bill is just to the please the jingoists in the Mail and Express.
|
|
|
Post by Timelord007 on Apr 23, 2017 9:02:53 GMT
Darth May!!, lmao, Charlesuirdhein you have made my day with that line .
|
|
|
Post by lidar on Apr 23, 2017 11:10:47 GMT
The citizenship thing was introduced at the time of the partition, it pre-dates the EU by decades, Eire citizen living in the UK get to vote in all our elections, the only foreign nationals to enjoy such a privilege, and again all down the settlement that was made when Ireland was partitioned. These existed before we were part of the EU, existed whilst we were part of the EU and I'm struggling to understand why they wouldn't continue after we left. Nope. That's not the issue. The right of UK nationals to have EU citizenship despite having left the EU and still not living in it is the issue, and that only dates since about the Good Friday Agreement. I am an Irish citizen living in the UK and I'm fully up on what MY rights are re the UK, it's the other way around that is the thing that wasn't considered. Not sure i see the issue. How is it different from someone living in england with 1 french parent and 1 english parent who has dual british/french nationality? The historical/legal/political background to the dual nationality is dfferent, the scale in NI is different, but it is the same basic issue. There will always be people with dual natiobality (for whatever reason). Biggest brexit issue in ni will be if the land border remains open (which everyone agrees they want) then the issue of an internal uk sea border with passport controls etc arises. Unionists would perceive this as undermining their britishness and be strongly opposed, possibly supported by the tory right. Nationalists want an open land border as a symbol of their irishness suuported by the irish government. Worth noting that the current talks / political crisis in ni is not about brexit.
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Apr 23, 2017 11:45:16 GMT
Well, when every citizen of one of the four countries of the UK retains the right to be an EU citizen and the others don't then there's a major discrepancy there. And it's all part of the peace process rather than the government of Ireland just granting it to them ad hoc, so THEY can't simply remove it nor would they. It's a loophole where all the angles haven't been thought through because no thought was given to it at all frankly. As for solving? Yeah, you're correct. We're going to have that ball of string to unravel for years to come. Wait until the GREAT ACT OF REPEAL arrives, or whatever Darth May is calling it now. Just to reassure you, the Great Repeal Bill she's announced doesn't actually repeal anything. Unless it changes radically from what she's announced all it will do is transfer all EU law into UK law, without repealing any of it. Calling it the Great Repeal Bill is just to the please the jingoists in the Mail and Express. As I understand it, the GRB does repeal the Act which took us into the EEC and made European law applicable in the U.K. But yes, it also transfers all applicable existing EU law into U.K. law. So the name is accurate, but only partially descriptive. I agree that little or no thought was given to the effect that Leave would have on Ireland / Northern Ireland, or Gibraltar for that matter (and much more). The Remain side did warn about the problems, but they were so sure of winning that no government preparation was done as to what would happen in the event of Leave, a huge mistake. As a general point, I think that dismissal of certain groups and their views over many years is the main reason we are in this mess. Re: Darth May. Don't agree, but presumably that means Obi-Wan Corbyn? (Can't quite see that either but he has the beard at least! ) So, perhaps we could skip the next seven weeks, save a lot of time and money and let them settle it right now, with light-sabres! "The polls are weak in you..."
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 23, 2017 16:26:53 GMT
Nope. That's not the issue. The right of UK nationals to have EU citizenship despite having left the EU and still not living in it is the issue, and that only dates since about the Good Friday Agreement. I am an Irish citizen living in the UK and I'm fully up on what MY rights are re the UK, it's the other way around that is the thing that wasn't considered. Not sure i see the issue. How is it different from someone living in england with 1 french parent and 1 english parent who has dual british/french nationality? The historical/legal/political background to the dual nationality is dfferent, the scale in NI is different, but it is the same basic issue. There will always be people with dual natiobality (for whatever reason). Biggest brexit issue in ni will be if the land border remains open (which everyone agrees they want) then the issue of an internal uk sea border with passport controls etc arises. Unionists would perceive this as undermining their britishness and be strongly opposed, possibly supported by the tory right. Nationalists want an open land border as a symbol of their irishness suuported by the irish government. Worth noting that the current talks / political crisis in ni is not about brexit. Oh, the current crisis in NI is not about Brexit but May called an election anyway despite that, so those currently trying to solve that crisis are now expending a chunk of that valuable time getting ready for an election. Did not care. The dual nationality thing is sheer scale, you effectively have an entire country legally guaranteed EU citizenship despite the union they're in leaving the EU.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 23, 2017 16:29:35 GMT
Just to reassure you, the Great Repeal Bill she's announced doesn't actually repeal anything. Unless it changes radically from what she's announced all it will do is transfer all EU law into UK law, without repealing any of it. Calling it the Great Repeal Bill is just to the please the jingoists in the Mail and Express. As I understand it, the GRB does repeal the Act which took us into the EEC and made European law applicable in the U.K. But yes, it also transfers all applicable existing EU law into U.K. law. So the name is accurate, but only partially descriptive. I agree that little or no thought was given to the effect that Leave would have on Ireland / Northern Ireland, or Gibraltar for that matter (and much more). The Remain side did warn about the problems, but they were so sure of winning that no government preparation was done as to what would happen in the event of Leave, a huge mistake. As a general point, I think that dismissal of certain groups and their views over many years is the main reason we are in this mess. Re: Darth May. Don't agree, but presumably that means Obi-Wan Corbyn? (Can't quite see that either but he has the beard at least! ) So, perhaps we could skip the next seven weeks, save a lot of time and money and let them settle it right now, with light-sabres! "The polls are weak in you..." I was comparing her more to Darth Tyranus as opposed to Vader.
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Apr 23, 2017 22:21:10 GMT
As I understand it, the GRB does repeal the Act which took us into the EEC and made European law applicable in the U.K. But yes, it also transfers all applicable existing EU law into U.K. law. So the name is accurate, but only partially descriptive. I agree that little or no thought was given to the effect that Leave would have on Ireland / Northern Ireland, or Gibraltar for that matter (and much more). The Remain side did warn about the problems, but they were so sure of winning that no government preparation was done as to what would happen in the event of Leave, a huge mistake. As a general point, I think that dismissal of certain groups and their views over many years is the main reason we are in this mess. Re: Darth May. Don't agree, but presumably that means Obi-Wan Corbyn? (Can't quite see that either but he has the beard at least! ) So, perhaps we could skip the next seven weeks, save a lot of time and money and let them settle it right now, with light-sabres! "The polls are weak in you..." I was comparing her more to Darth Tyranus as opposed to Vader. That shows my age for sure! When I think Star Wars, it's always IV, V & VI
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Apr 23, 2017 22:34:52 GMT
I was comparing her more to Darth Tyranus as opposed to Vader. That shows my age for sure! When I think Star Wars, it's always IV, V & VI Well, The Clone Wars and Rebels have redefined I, II and III for me so much. Love those shows.
|
|