|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Jan 11, 2018 19:01:28 GMT
In DWM, awhile back, Steven Moffatt stated that the New Adventures contiunty no longer applies, but is a 'separate (and equally valid) continuity'. How do you feel about it no longer being canon? Well, he used it when it was necessary. Referencing past companions in Night of the Doctor. Except...those aren't New Adventures companions.
|
|
|
Post by thethirddoctor on Jan 11, 2018 19:51:25 GMT
Well, he used it when it was necessary. Referencing past companions in Night of the Doctor. Except...those aren't New Adventures companions. Didn't he reference NA companions?
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Jan 11, 2018 19:58:25 GMT
Except...those aren't New Adventures companions. Didn't he reference NA companions? The companions referenced in Night of the Doctor are Big Finish ones, nothing to do with the NAs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 20:05:55 GMT
Given that no one in any episode ever just stands around, pointing out what definitely didn't happen, I'd say that the only external opinion on what is and isn't part of current continuity is each individual fan. And if the indisputable continuity of the show itself can survive three versions of Atlantis, and other such incongruities, then whatever makes up each individual fan's personal and preferred canon (if they even care about such things to begin with) should be able to continue on unabated regardless of such statements, even if they are made by someone connected to the show.
Or in other words, I don't think it means anything, and I really wouldn't worry about it.
|
|
|
Post by whiskeybrewer on Jan 12, 2018 12:17:20 GMT
Don't worry if me and @wolfie53 have any say in it with our theory, Lungbarrow or a version of it will be Canon
mwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jan 12, 2018 16:25:39 GMT
Anything that tosses the Lungbarrow nonsense out the door is fine by me. That said, I really don't get hung up on continuity. And to be honest, the NA's were hit and miss - more miss as many of the books were terrible at best. To be fair, I enjoyed parts of Lungbarrow, even though I think the whole looms things were nonsense. And some of the NA's were so far out there, well, I don't know what to make of them. So I basically agree with Colin on this one. I don't see any benefit to someone coming out and saying X is no longer canon. Say what you like about RTD, but I think he made the cannier decision. Pillage the NA for ideas that work, but don't announce an official policy regarding canonicity. What's the point to it? You could argue that the televised Human Nature effectively invalidated the NA version as far as canon goes, because Silver Nemesis/Remembrance of the Daleks notwithstanding, the Doctor would hardly fail to notice that he had the same adventure twice. You make some good points.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 0:54:34 GMT
Don't worry if me and @wolfie53 have any say in it with our theory, Lungbarrow or a version of it will be Canon
mwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha "Nothing in ze world will stop us now!" But in all seriousness, it's a discussion up there with "which is the definitive Shada?" or "what canonicity are TV Comic?" I only found out about Lungbarrow and the NAs through the official Doctor Who website circa 2006, I would never have known it existed otherwise. Back then, I took that as a tacit acknowledgment, particularly given that Human Nature was advertised on the main page as "the one that started it all!" The policy's changed so now that's less true. *shrug* Okay. That view's valid, but we still enjoy melding the two backgrounds together. Besides, writing on an everyday story-by-story basis, it won't really come into play too often. The Doctor likes to keep his past to himself. I don't see any benefit to someone coming out and saying X is no longer canon. Say what you like about RTD, but I think he made the cannier decision. Pillage the NA for ideas that work, but don't announce an official policy regarding canonicity. What's the point to it? You could argue that the televised Human Nature effectively invalidated the NA version as far as canon goes, because Silver Nemesis/Remembrance of the Daleks notwithstanding, the Doctor would hardly fail to notice that he had the same adventure twice. Agreed, I'm not a fan of the auteur "this is the line upon which we make our continuity". I prefer to read my Rihannasu and have my Romulans too. Actually, talking of duplicate adventures, there's also the possibility -- because of time travel -- that some stories exist transcendentally as well. Like, if you wanted both versions of Shada to be canon, for instance, you could have the original be part of continuity up until The Five Doctors... Then, after Borusa and the time scoop, that gap is filled by the Paul McGann version and that becomes official. My view of the Time War was very similar. Any solid rules established during the classic series get thrown straight out the window, along with the window... Potentially the whole wall too, we'll see how the Daleks feel. Debates become about whether the Third Doctor was Jon Pertwee, David Warner, Tim Treolear or Ron Moody; all are true and all are false. The whole of space and time becomes an utter madhouse before it eventually collapses into one single thread, the one followed by NuWho in whatever shape it may be (kronkburgers and Chelonians notwithstanding).
|
|
|
Post by sherlock on Jan 13, 2018 1:13:59 GMT
Officially there is no canon. Moffat's statements aren't definitive, that just means when he was writing he didn't take the novels' continuity into account.
Personally I don't include the novel ranges in what I consider 'canon'. Just TV and audios, and maybe the comics (I go back and forth on that one). The novels' version of Who is just so unique that it might be better to have it stand alone its own thing. That said I do wile away some hours pondering on resolving the continuities (I have an elaborate theory involving reconciling the EDAs and audios).
And just because something is not canon that doesn't mean it can't be enjoyed. The Unbounds are a prime example of that.
|
|
|
Post by omega on Jan 13, 2018 1:16:14 GMT
Shrodinger's canonicity. Any given story, character or whatever is both canon or non-canon until one or the other is imposed on it. In fact, this status usually only remains for the story imposing the canonicity, or lack of. The only stories rendering the book Human Nature non-canon are the TV adaptation and The End of Time Part 2. Time can easily be rewritten to make the book version canon over the TV version.
The Eighth Doctor audios. In Minuet in Hell former companion Sam is mentioned, putting the audios at this put in the same canon as the novels where Sam Jones (Short for Samantha) was the first companion. However it's explained in Terror Firma that Sam was the companion Samson, brother to Gemma, both of whom travelled with the Doctor prior to his travels with Charley (an example of retconning).
|
|
shutupbanks
Castellan
There’s a horror movie called Alien? That’s really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you.
Likes: 5,677
|
Post by shutupbanks on Jan 13, 2018 2:53:52 GMT
A show that had three different fates for Atlantis in its first decade or so of existence doesn't place too high a value on continuity, I think.
To be frank, most people who watch the show will only have a nodding acquaintance, if that, with the NAs and will accept the continuity of the program over the continuity of some novels that were only read - if we're honest - by a small fraction of current fans. I loved more than a few of them but the show "sets" the history in place and that's what most people would expect: tie-in stories - even if they're all that is produced for a long time - should be considered as a subset or an alternative history. I realise that it's probably not going to win me any friends here, but our showrunners to date have proven that they have more than the aforementioned nodding acquaintance with the NAs and have picked what they like from them and ignored or cast aside what they haven't. As Terrance Dicks and other staff have said, you can't expect casual viewers to remember precise details from more than three years previously. I can cope with the spirit, if not the letter, of this policy being adhered to so long as it doesn't create whacking great holes in the time stream.
|
|
|
Post by J.A. Prentice on Jan 13, 2018 4:03:33 GMT
Of course they’re not part of the TV continuity. That’s on the OUTSIDE of the Bottle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 11:52:38 GMT
I've actually been pondering this in the back of my head all day... I think canonicity is up to the individual, but internal continuity (i.e. narrative consistency) should line up, if brought up. I'm thinking something like Star Trek: Voyager which couldn't decide how many decks the ship had, how low their supplies were, if they were comfortable breaking the Prime Directive, etc. Elementary fact-checking and historical accuracy. If specific elements from a past adventure are going to be brought up, it should match what actually happened (for instance, The Monster of Peladon accurately referencing King Peladon from Curse when he's mentioned). Otherwise, you get the Antalin confusion of War of the Daleks.
|
|
|
Post by iainmclaughlin on Jan 13, 2018 14:15:40 GMT
It's all canon. It's all valid even when it contradicts itself. Time's a tangled mess, so... whatever anybody says, in my head it's all canon in the Who Omniverse - including Cushing, REG and Rowan Atkinson.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Jan 13, 2018 14:43:36 GMT
It's all canon. It's all valid even when it contradicts itself. Time's a tangled mess, so... whatever anybody says, in my head it's all canon in the Who Omniverse - including Cushing, REG and Rowan Atkinson. You need to go and lie down with the curtains closed
|
|
|
Post by Ela on Jan 14, 2018 7:54:12 GMT
Of course they’re not part of the TV continuity. That’s on the OUTSIDE of the Bottle. I never bought that inside the bottle/outside the bottle stuff, myself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2018 8:40:15 GMT
Of course they’re not part of the TV continuity. That’s on the OUTSIDE of the Bottle. I never bought that inside the bottle/outside the bottle stuff, myself. As it turns out, neither did Lawrence Miles in the end. It's all canon. It's all valid even when it contradicts itself. Time's a tangled mess, so... whatever anybody says, in my head it's all canon in the Who Omniverse - including Cushing, REG and Rowan Atkinson. Well, I'm certain if you put the Amicus!Doctor, the Warner!Doctor and Atkinson!Doctor together in a room with say, our Fourth Doctor, they would all insist they were from the "prime universe". And in no small way, they'd all be absolutely right. Where they come from, their exploits are real while the TV continuity is the alt!universe apocrypha. It's a classic parallax effect, the same object looking different depending on from where one sees it (like pre- Dominion Elizabeth Klein trying to, from her perspective, correct history to its proper course).
|
|
|
Post by iainmclaughlin on Jan 14, 2018 10:37:20 GMT
I never bought that inside the bottle/outside the bottle stuff, myself. As it turns out, neither did Lawrence Miles in the end. It's all canon. It's all valid even when it contradicts itself. Time's a tangled mess, so... whatever anybody says, in my head it's all canon in the Who Omniverse - including Cushing, REG and Rowan Atkinson. Well, I'm certain if you put the Amicus!Doctor, the Warner!Doctor and Atkinson!Doctor together in a room with say, our Fourth Doctor, they would all insist they were from the "prime universe". And in no small way, they'd all be absolutely right. Where they come from, their exploits are real while the TV continuity is the alt!universe apocrypha. It's a classic parallax effect, the same object looking different depending on from where one sees it (like pre- Dominion Elizabeth Klein trying to, from her perspective, correct history to its proper course). A few years ago I did write a short story, The Other Three Doctors, for an anthology that put Cushing, REG, Atkinson and the Other together with a near miss from Eccleston (he was a few seconds late)... the best way I saw to make it works was to treat every one as if he saw his universe as Prime.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2018 10:43:53 GMT
Well they did it with star wars! True, true, still a bit miffed about that tbh. I understand why they did it -- they had something like thirty years worth of canon in between -- but it still feels like a cheat. That's the thing I like about Who. The majority of the time, it's a soft reset like Terror of the Autons or Remembrance of the Daleks. I don't think you really need more than that, a lot of really excellent eras on the show were able to step out of their predecessor's shadow without having to kill their predecessor. The annihilate option feels a bit like a Carthaginian peace: they make a desert and call it canon. I'm a big believer in the non-binary choice when it comes to these sorts of things. I think the Doctor had parents and was loomed into Lungbarrow both. One likely led to the other, we've no idea who else's genetic data was inputted into the machine (the Other sure, but likely his mother and father too). The complexity makes him all the more intriguing and unique. It's fun. It's more then that, though - if your relaunching something as big as Star Wars, you want to make it as big and fresh and having information out there that detracts from that experience is a bit of a liability, particularly in light of the prequel triolgey. Disney wasn't just relaunching Star Wars for fans, but for a more general audience and the need for any sort of perquisite to read thirty years of material detracts from that. But it's nice to see that there's still respect for the EU under the Legends label and I'm sure it's going to be revisited in some form or another one in it's own space one day. But now, let me say it: MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARA JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2018 2:11:54 GMT
True, true, still a bit miffed about that tbh. I understand why they did it -- they had something like thirty years worth of canon in between -- but it still feels like a cheat. That's the thing I like about Who. The majority of the time, it's a soft reset like Terror of the Autons or Remembrance of the Daleks. I don't think you really need more than that, a lot of really excellent eras on the show were able to step out of their predecessor's shadow without having to kill their predecessor. The annihilate option feels a bit like a Carthaginian peace: they make a desert and call it canon. I'm a big believer in the non-binary choice when it comes to these sorts of things. I think the Doctor had parents and was loomed into Lungbarrow both. One likely led to the other, we've no idea who else's genetic data was inputted into the machine (the Other sure, but likely his mother and father too). The complexity makes him all the more intriguing and unique. It's fun. It's more then that, though - if your relaunching something as big as Star Wars, you want to make it as big and fresh and having information out there that detracts from that experience is a bit of a liability, particularly in light of the prequel triolgey. Disney wasn't just relaunching Star Wars for fans, but for a more general audience and the need for any sort of perquisite to read thirty years of material detracts from that. But it's nice to see that there's still respect for the EU under the Legends label and I'm sure it's going to be revisited in some form or another one in it's own space one day. But now, let me say it: MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARA JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. True, I get that, but Star Wars tends to fall prey to that nowadays anyway with Leia floating back through the vacuum of space and that Stormtrooper chap who yelled "Traitor!" in TFA, among other things. Going to the theatres with a hardcore fan and a casual viewer makes for some interesting post-film talks. One talking about Force Bubble, the other asking why that wasn't put in the script. Him saying it was in a book from the late 90s, her saying that she shouldn't have to read the book to understand the film, etc. Having done marketing (blegh), roping them all under the Legends banner feels like a marketing move. I think more than anything it was done so they could push their new EU material as being more relevant to the current trilogy, while still retaining their former fanbase. Not even one day as it turns out, Thrawn has already made an appearance in Rebels and the Mandalorians frequented in The Clone Wars quite a bit (to the point that Mandalore got an appearance). I'd be pretty bewildered if the Emperor's Hand didn't pop up sooner rather than later. As it turns out, neither did Lawrence Miles in the end. Well, I'm certain if you put the Amicus!Doctor, the Warner!Doctor and Atkinson!Doctor together in a room with say, our Fourth Doctor, they would all insist they were from the "prime universe". And in no small way, they'd all be absolutely right. Where they come from, their exploits are real while the TV continuity is the alt!universe apocrypha. It's a classic parallax effect, the same object looking different depending on from where one sees it (like pre- Dominion Elizabeth Klein trying to, from her perspective, correct history to its proper course). A few years ago I did write a short story, The Other Three Doctors, for an anthology that put Cushing, REG, Atkinson and the Other together with a near miss from Eccleston (he was a few seconds late)... the best way I saw to make it works was to treat every one as if he saw his universe as Prime. That sounds brilliant. Isn't it great that DW is so large we can do this kind of stuff? I mean, hell, it's big enough that a dimension-hopping Eighth Doctor can briefly find himself in Peanuts with the Rani during The Glorious Dead:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2018 12:42:47 GMT
It's more then that, though - if your relaunching something as big as Star Wars, you want to make it as big and fresh and having information out there that detracts from that experience is a bit of a liability, particularly in light of the prequel triolgey. Disney wasn't just relaunching Star Wars for fans, but for a more general audience and the need for any sort of perquisite to read thirty years of material detracts from that. But it's nice to see that there's still respect for the EU under the Legends label and I'm sure it's going to be revisited in some form or another one in it's own space one day. But now, let me say it: MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARA JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. True, I get that, but Star Wars tends to fall prey to that nowadays anyway with Leia floating back through the vacuum of space and that Stormtrooper chap who yelled "Traitor!" in TFA, among other things. Going to the theatres with a hardcore fan and a casual viewer makes for some interesting post-film talks. One talking about Force Bubble, the other asking why that wasn't put in the script. Him saying it was in a book from the late 90s, her saying that she shouldn't have to read the book to understand the film, etc. Having done marketing (blegh), roping them all under the Legends banner feels like a marketing move. I think more than anything it was done so they could push their new EU material as being more relevant to the current trilogy, while still retaining their former fanbase. Not even one day as it turns out, Thrawn has already made an appearance in Rebels and the Mandalorians frequented in The Clone Wars quite a bit (to the point that Mandalore got an appearance). I'd be pretty bewildered if the Emperor's Hand didn't pop up sooner rather than later. I've heard they have appropriated elements from the Extended Universe, but, I haven't the budget to check out much of the new EU material, sadly I do think one day though we'll see something new set in the old EU. I don't think it's just savy Disney marketing, though - I think there is a genuine concern and sense of preservation that these stories aren't 'lost', just as Dark Horse reprinted Marvel's material in the nineties and Marvel is doing likewise.
|
|