shutupbanks
Castellan
There’s a horror movie called Alien? That’s really offensive. No wonder everyone keeps invading you.
Likes: 5,677
|
Post by shutupbanks on Jul 29, 2017 12:29:29 GMT
(My bolding) I'm guessing that you don't like the idea that this video is highlighting the huge following the show has among the gay community. A following it has had for several decades now and which one of the speakers (Benjamin Cook, I think) says in the first two minutes puts them in a group with nearly everybody else who loves the show. I don't think the emphasis is on the fact that it's a show specifically for gay people, just that the gay community has a vocal set of fans for whom the show has some personal relevance. They aren't claiming the show as their's alone nor are they saying that it's got a homosexual agenda, just that a lot of them really like it and identify with the themes shown in particular stories and characters. It's still a show for everyone, it's just that some fans are from demographics that aren't you or me. And given that the show was commissioned by a Canadian, first produced by a woman, with a first story directed by a gay Indian man and starred a cast with a thirty-year gap in ages that was meant to appeal to all elements of the family, I think that's fine. My point is what would people say if they did a type of video that was saying how heterosexuals like the show. Surely, you'd criticize it, then. When people ask me if I'm a big fan of the show, I tell them that I am such a big fan of the show that I married a Sarah Jane - if that's not using my heterosexuality as a means of expressing my love for Doctor Who, I don't know what is. You do know that this week marked 50 years since homosexuality was decriminalised in the UK, don't you? And while I'm not terribly active in fandom, I have seen lots of photos of Who-themed weddings, kids in costumes, couples done up as doctors and companions or matching monsters that are all pretty damn cool - it's people showing their love for a show that I like. How is that not awesome? In fact, here in Australia, we had an aftershow for this season called Whovians that was hosted by a guy whose wife was an occasional guest. There was also a couple who were panelists and a gay guy. Sometimes they had politicians and other celebrities on from different walks of life who all love Who. Amazingly, they all got along together and celebrated the fact that they have the love of a show in common.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 12:52:35 GMT
My point is what would people say if they did a type of video that was saying how heterosexuals like the show. Surely, you'd criticize it, then. Same reason no one needs a straight pride march. You've already acknowledged that despite equality in the law, socially we're nowhere near where we need to be, so why are you still having this discussion? Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 12:56:14 GMT
My point is what would people say if they did a type of video that was saying how heterosexuals like the show. Surely, you'd criticize it, then. When people ask me if I'm a big fan of the show, I tell them that I am such a big fan of the show that I married a Sarah Jane - if that's not using my heterosexuality as a means of expressing my love for Doctor Who, I don't know what is. You do know that this week marked 50 years since homosexuality was decriminalised in the UK, don't you? And while I'm not terribly active in fandom, I have seen lots of photos of Who-themed weddings, kids in costumes, couples done up as doctors and companions or matching monsters that are all pretty damn cool - it's people showing their love for a show that I like. How is that not awesome? In fact, here in Australia, we had an aftershow for this season called Whovians that was hosted by a guy whose wife was an occasional guest. There was also a couple who were panelists and a gay guy. Sometimes they had politicians and other celebrities on from different walks of life who all love Who. Amazingly, they all got along together and celebrated the fact that they have the love of a show in common. That's my point. Don't make a big deal about people being gay. If homosexuality has been decriminalised for now 50 years, I can get the historical shows on BBC 2. And that Whovians show seems to have people from different walks of life and not discusing that. Just discussing their love for the show. This video seems to be making some correlation, though, that gay people specifically like Doctor Who. And I agree with what Benjamin Cook says at the start, but - then - I don't see the point in this video. It's not discussing the history of gay characters in the show - it seems to be more interesting in discussing why gay people, in particular, like it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 12:56:38 GMT
Same reason no one needs a straight pride march. You've already acknowledged that despite equality in the law, socially we're nowhere near where we need to be, so why are you still having this discussion? Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it. Ahhh... I can see where your line of thought is coming from, but it's actually the other way around. People talk and talk and talk about it until it becomes something mundane and therefore accepted. By not talking about it, you get situations where "We don't talk about the War," and people don't know how to handle it because they weren't exposed to it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 12:58:06 GMT
My point is what would people say if they did a type of video that was saying how heterosexuals like the show. Surely, you'd criticize it, then. Either you don't understand the concept of representation, you're against it or you're looking for a rise out of people. This is like those "Why can't we have Straight Pride?" moronic arguments - because it was never illegal to be out and proud hetero. There's no story in being part of the societal status quo. I don't get what's so difficult for you here. Since the Fan-Show represents fans en masse, why can't you see they're exploring one sub-section of fans to co-incide with a landmark anniversary. There was a Doctor Who confidential that explored the show's international fans - that one video didn't mean the series was suddenly just for them did it? No. I don't like it because I disagree with the idea of diversity for the sake of it. My menatality is best person for the job. And it's not illegal to be gay in the UK anymore, so why do people have to go around saying I'm proud to be gay. Who cares?
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Jul 29, 2017 13:00:51 GMT
Same reason no one needs a straight pride march. You've already acknowledged that despite equality in the law, socially we're nowhere near where we need to be, so why are you still having this discussion? Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it. Ah. I see where you're coming from. You're actually entirely wrong about this but I want to believe a well intentioned wrong. Fair enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 13:01:16 GMT
Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it. Ahhh... I can see where your line of thought is coming from, but it's actually the other way around. People talk and talk and talk about it until it becomes something mundane and therefore accepted. By not talking about it, you get situations where "We don't talk about the War," and people don't know how to handle it because they weren't exposed to it. But I disagree with that. It's why racism started in the first place. People recognised people because they were POC. And there are a lot of headcases out there, who believe that one experience with a person of a certain group of people equates to all of them being the same. If they do start being racist, call them out, but don't in the first place just refer to people as being gay. If I'm honest, the only reason I think people see social divisions getting worse is because people are becoming progressively less understanding of flippant jokes and/or people getting fed up of people going out of their way to call themselves gay. Who actually cares?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 13:01:53 GMT
Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it. Ah. I see where you're coming from. You're actually entirely wrong about this but I want to believe a well intentioned wrong. Fair enough. I could say the same about you on this, though.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Jul 29, 2017 13:08:20 GMT
Ah. I see where you're coming from. You're actually entirely wrong about this but I want to believe a well intentioned wrong. Fair enough. I could say the same about you on this, though. Yes, you could. But you seem to be, and do correct me here if I'm misreading you, operating on the belief that social divisions are somehow divisive, that diversity is wrong. You've spoken about diversity for it's own sake but do you actually think anyone comes out as LGBTQ because they want to suffer all the social nonsense that is currently embedded in our society? Yes, Homosexuality has been decriminalized for 50 years, that meant damn all in societal attitudes, and in many, many places still doesn't. Diversity isn't wrong, in fact diversity is a vital part of a healthy society.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 13:12:55 GMT
Ahhh... I can see where your line of thought is coming from, but it's actually the other way around. People talk and talk and talk about it until it becomes something mundane and therefore accepted. By not talking about it, you get situations where "We don't talk about the War," and people don't know how to handle it because they weren't exposed to it. But I disagree with that. It's why racism started in the first place. People recognised people because they were POC. And there are a lot of headcases out there, who believe that one experience with a person of a certain group of people equates to all of them being the same. If they do start being racist, call them out, but don't in the first place just refer to people as being gay. If I'm honest, the only reason I think people see social divisions getting worse is because people are becoming progressively less understanding of flippant jokes and/or people getting fed up of people going out of their way to call themselves gay. Who actually cares? Well, think about it... Does decriminalising something change a person's mind? Instantly, in a flash. All that prejudice has melted away with the passing of a bill. *shakes head* Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. The stigma towards these people is still there. It's slowly crumbling away because of changes in societal norms, but there is still a push back and I'm not talking about Third World countries either, I'm talking about First World nations. Places that should know better. It's not all that long ago that the AIDS crisis turned being gay into a literal hell because of misinformation or deliberate ignorance. Now that they're allowed by society to more openly display their sexuality in a way that won't get them hung or skinned alive, they celebrate it. In the same way that a group of Grecians in Canada can all dance to "Zorba". It's a demonstration of personal freedom for a sect of society that are known to be sneered, jeered or just outright ignored like they aren't human beings. And honestly, with my own sister falling under the B in the LGBTQ, I can safely say that matters to us. If no one else will, the families care.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 13:29:13 GMT
I could say the same about you on this, though. Yes, you could. But you seem to be, and do correct me here if I'm misreading you, operating on the belief that social divisions are somehow divisive, that diversity is wrong. You've spoken about diversity for it's own sake but do you actually think anyone comes out as LGBTQ because they want to suffer all the social nonsense that is currently embedded in our society? Yes, Homosexuality has been decriminalized for 50 years, that meant damn all in societal attitudes, and in many, many places still doesn't. Diversity isn't wrong, in fact diversity is a vital part of a healthy society. Mmm, a society without diversity of thought stagnates. Without tradition, there is no baseline to innovate. How can one do something new, if one doesn't know what is old? Without innovation, tradition becomes obsolete and even the most stalwart of traditions must redefine themselves in one way or another in order to maintain their relevance. Everything from fairy tales to Morris dancing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2017 18:21:21 GMT
In other news I really enjoyed this week's episode. Maybe it would've been nicer to actually take a look at the contribution to the show that LGBTQ people have made over the years in further fetail, but sod it- it's the fan show and it can be about fans if it wants to 😁.
P.S. I think Christel has got a lot better at hosting the show since the start of series 10. She never really convinced me as a confident presenter at the start of her run but at this point she's basically a natural.
|
|
|
Post by Audio Watchdog on Jul 29, 2017 20:08:38 GMT
That was actually a really interesting video to watch. Thanks Mark.
|
|
|
Post by Audio Watchdog on Jul 29, 2017 23:27:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aussiedoctorwhofan on Jul 30, 2017 2:43:52 GMT
I watched the video- I enjoyed it, as a hetro man I welcome anyone enjoying the show- different people get different things out of the show for various reasons.. I remember when I 1st watched Who, it was 4th Dr story (Meglos) and for some reason I was $h.t scared of something in the ep, I was 5 years old.. Now it means something different.. I was genuinely surprised they picked a female for the role, then I thought they really must have something extra special awesome planned for the next season so I am 101% going to support it for sure.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2017 6:10:36 GMT
Actually, the chap in the video raises an interesting question. Do we believe that each incarnation of the Doctor has the same sexuality or does it alter?
I'm inclined to believe that the classic series Doctors are differing asexual categories (the First and Third Doctors being aromantic, the Second Doctor possibly being biromantic, etc.), but Eight is very much when it starts to become a prominent part of his "love of life" personality. There are a lot of little examples scattered around all over the place. The audios tended to keep him closer to his predecessors, but his friendship with Grace and later/earlier with Fitz in the novels certainly has its moments.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2017 10:38:15 GMT
Same reason no one needs a straight pride march. You've already acknowledged that despite equality in the law, socially we're nowhere near where we need to be, so why are you still having this discussion? Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it. I do actually agree with that. People are people. I'm not sure if the rest of the world has got to that level yet though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2017 12:12:05 GMT
Because I think the only way to stop social divisions is if we ignore them. People don't need to come out as gay because nobody should care, just the same as a straight person. The only way to stop inequality is to stop thinking of people as different, which means to just stop talking about it. I do actually agree with that. People are people. I'm not sure if the rest of the world has got to that level yet though. Exactly. Don't get me wrong @budnp2013 , I'd really like it if everyone engaged with everyone else on equal footing, irrespective of class, colour, creed or belief, but the human race doesn't learn to accept something by ignoring it. I wish we did, but it's just not how we as a species work on a societal level. It's why I brought up the War idea, I had a conversation with someone two days ago who'd lived through the Second World War -- my grandmother. She said that the only other people who understood her father when he came back were other soldiers. Why? People didn't want to know. Ignoring it didn't do him or any of the others like him any favours as it meant no one understood. No one even tried to understand. It was only when in the eighties that people started talking openly about combat shock and outreach programmes for soldiers. Mental health as it's become is only something like thirty or forty years old because for it wasn't proper to discuss the mental troubles of people. It's the same thing here with LGBTQ+ representation. Every once in a while, there needs to be a nudge to make people genuinely think about these topics. To expose, engage and educate to the point that it develops and becomes accepted. An idea kept to oneself isn't an idea that catches on and a move towards any kind of equality whether it's racial, gendered, ethnic, cultural or even psychological requires discussion. Just like this. Here, now.
|
|
|
Post by charlesuirdhein on Jul 30, 2017 12:24:50 GMT
Actually, the chap in the video raises an interesting question. Do we believe that each incarnation of the Doctor has the same sexuality or does it alter? I'm inclined to believe that the classic series Doctors are differing asexual categories (the First and Third Doctors being aromantic, the Second Doctor possibly being biromantic, etc.), but Eight is very much when it starts to become a prominent part of his "love of life" personality. There are a lot of little examples scattered around all over the place. The audios tended to keep him closer to his predecessors, but his friendship with Grace and later/earlier with Fitz in the novels certainly has its moments. I think the Third might have been aromantic, but you can hardly say the First Doctor, who is a grandfather is aromantic, or asexual for that matter. He may have lived to a point in his incarnation where it's not any sort of drive for him. Of course the other Doctors are still that grandfather but their incarnations didn't live it. And I'm only speaking about what we see on screen here, I'm not wandering down the rabbit hole of "the Other" and all that that entails.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2017 14:06:28 GMT
I do actually agree with that. People are people. I'm not sure if the rest of the world has got to that level yet though. the human race doesn't learn to accept something by ignoring it. Yes we do. We don't notice something it doesn't matter.
|
|