Who Will Replace Jack? May 3, 2021 14:40:12 GMT via mobile
Post by johnhurtdoctor on May 3, 2021 14:40:12 GMT
firsty I am not saying Barrowman Or Clarke is right or wrong just until theyhave been prosecuted of unlawful activity we should stop this judgement And talk of banning/boycotting their work
Exposing your self is not sexual harassment, we do it in the toilet everyday, and the law on exposure is complicated but based on situation not the act.......Example in uk law it’s perfectly allowed to be naked in your own garden but if someone overlooks you and complains you must refrain from doing it.....no one apart from Noel has made a complaint as he tried to excuse his behaviour........In fact it’s often been joked about by barrowmans co-workers it’s never been a secret
it’s something the work place should have dealt with its no Retrospective criminal act.
it’s all about context
its not nice, and I’m not excusing it but we need to Put it in perspective,
do we sack and boycott everyone who has mooned out of the window at you, photocopied their bits, or everyone who has ever played who can wee the furthest/ highest with a work mate .........We would lose a third of workers over night, hell! I had a boss who mooned out the window of his office if he thought you were talking to long.......
it sounds horrid written down but was something everyone just laughed and pointed at no one was harmed it worked you were embarrassed but much less than being shouted.
retrospective bad behaviour would mean we should no longer watch films Or show anything by the loathsome Robert Mitchum, christoper Walker, humphy bogart, Oliver Reed, Peter o’toole, many bands from 60’s, 70’s & 80’s and numerous others.........we need to Look long and hard about witch-hunting.......we have laws and trial by social media is not the way to deal with stuff we cannot go on condoning something and persecuting others........
The companies that stop working with the accused are cowardly and wrong to publicly convict before an offence has been proved in law, it’s fine to stop working privately but to not show something and publicly denounce them because of allegations is just being judge and jury and executioner is just wrong
we knew of johns crude behaviour long before this and accepted it (if not approved), where Noel Clark’s Appears wrong and has been hidden, harmful and Now reported and now being investigated. He has yet to be found guilty of anything.
Just think about last time you broke the law (we all do it, be it speeding, swearing, ripping a cd or dvd, etc) should someone on twitter decide your fate based on their option and no facts or context, or should we let the law decide if there has been an offence, then act.
sorry to rant, but this judgement on someone’s life over social media is Just so wrong and has to stop, what happened to everyone is innocent until proven guilty
It's not judgement over social media. It's holding people to account for their actions. If I had a boss who mooned out the window I would report them. Unacceptable. If I knew someone at work had photocopied their genitalia I would report them. Unacceptable. Yes we have always known about Barrowman's behaviour & some of us have always thought it unacceptable. Weird how it is being called witch-hunting or trial by social media. People are allowed to discuss these things & how they feel about them on social media or a forum. Also we don't expose ourselves in the toilet everyday, bit weird to try to equate rubbing genitalia against a coworker or walking around the workplace with your gentials out to going to the toilet.